Teams

2: Hayes/IS

2025 TUL ADULT 18 & Over Day League · 3.0 WOMEN-DAY

15 players · average NTRP 3.30 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-18vs Ashman/LFWon 41
W#1 DoublesAndrea Hayes / Briana Schrieber vs Karlie Free / Haley Ragsdale6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLindsey Poole vs Sarah McPhail0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTanya Hernadi / Barb Evans vs Ashley Kent / Whitney Largent6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAndrea Winters vs Noelle Kilgore6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathryn Jessogne / Meagan Jacobs-Irwin vs Danielle Watson / Jennifer Auer6-3, 6-2
2024-11-11vs Bryan/LFWon 31
W#1 DoublesBarb Evans / Briana Schrieber vs Rhonda Hoffman / Theresa Melega7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEleanor Doyle vs Michelle Bryan7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichelle Hackett / Suzanne Rackleff vs Callie Wilson / Spring Carter3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea Winters vs Beverly Davison6-0, 6-1
2024-10-28vs Seifried/LFWon 40
W#1 DoublesBarb Evans / Tanya Hernadi vs Lori Hubbard / Ashley Torres6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesEleanor Doyle vs Katie Carpenter6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Hackett / Meagan Jacobs-Irwin vs Adria Sanditen / Marilynda Kuehn6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Johnson / Kathryn Jessogne vs Kelly Hunt / Jennifer McPhail6-1, 6-3
2024-10-21vs Hunt/LFWon 31
W#1 DoublesBarb Evans / Andrea Hayes vs Lauren Hunt / Molly McCormick6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Hackett / Suzanne Rackleff vs Lacey Vogts / Hilliary Lenhart3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesEleanor Doyle vs Abby Reid6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Winters / Sheila Cooper vs Katie Sachse / Bailey Bird6-1, 7-6
2024-10-14vs 3: Wolff/LFSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBarb Evans / Tanya Hernadi vs Lucy Bishop / Vivian Rogers6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesEleanor Doyle vs Brooke Meehan6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTatum Hay / Julie Cyran vs Lauren Gellman / Jen Clouse2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMeagan Jacobs-Irwin vs Jaqueline Troyke2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesBarb Evans / Tanya Hernadi vs Stacy Teague / Michelle Hendrickson0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesEleanor Doyle vs Jessica Ullrich6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndrea Hayes / Suzanne Rackleff vs Casey Chonka / Jennifer Nicole McCants3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesBriana Schrieber vs Trisha Millington2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTatum Hay / Sheila Cooper vs Cassidy Nelson / Angela Corley3-6, 5-7
2024-09-30vs Watling 3.0/SHWon 31
W#1 DoublesBarb Evans / Andrea Hayes vs Crystal Stovall / Susan Robinett6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBriana Schrieber vs Felicity Jones3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Winters / Tatum Hay vs Tracy Lee / Jennifer Potts6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathryn Jessogne / Stephanie Johnson vs Kristin Bradshaw / Emily Moreau6-1, 6-4
2024-09-23vs Keep/Carrasco/LFWon 41
W#1 DoublesBarb Evans / Andrea Hayes vs Annie Richardson / Suzanne Laravea6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEleanor Doyle vs Brandi Phillips6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichelle Hackett / Suzanne Rackleff vs Beverly Colson / Laura Keep6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLindsey Poole vs Sandra Scharf5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathryn Jessogne / Stephanie Johnson vs Christy Reece / Lisa Faith6-2, 6-0
2024-09-16vs Boedeker/TTCWon 41
W#1 DoublesAndrea Hayes / Briana Schrieber vs Deidra Kirtley / Jan Girouard6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindsey Poole vs Barbara Bardsley6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Rackleff / Michelle Hackett vs Katie Gibbon / Ashleigh Boedeker6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMeagan Jacobs-Irwin vs Tricia Dailey1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSheila Cooper / Julie Cyran vs Suzanne Wills / Cynthia Elias6-3, 6-3
2024-09-09vs Jones/GRWon 32
L#1 DoublesTanya Hernadi / Briana Schrieber vs Rachel Monks / Amber Reynolds5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEleanor Doyle vs Kara Plaster6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Winters / Andrea Hayes vs Mindy Jones / Natalie Carrico6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLindsey Poole vs Caitlin Key6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTatum Hay / Kathryn Jessogne vs Jill Jmaeff / Jill Croka5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0 WOMEN-DAY
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12: Hayes/IS91371329342
22: Quick/GR91371330321
33: Wolff/LF82381230340
4declined/Corley-Hamilton/18&over3.0W82331742406
5Bryan/LF73311946419
6Ashman/LF73292147408
7Keep/Carrasco/LF36182761446
8Watling 3.0/SH27153061415
9Jones/GR28173369507
10Seifried/LF19143677543
11Swiggett/LF010104083564

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Eleanor Doyle
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
Andrea Hayes
published 3.5
3.16
Andrea Winters
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Suzanne Rackleff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Barb Evans
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Briana Schrieber
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Tanya Hernadi
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.63
Lindsey Poole
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.62
Kathryn Jessogne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Tatum Hay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Cyran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kerry Fesperman
published
Meagan Jacobs-Irwin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Hackett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Cooper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Fesperman + Tatum Hay3254% games+9.2% vs expected
Barb Evans + Andrea Winters4166% games+8.4% vs expected
Tatum Hay + Andrea Winters8364% games+7.4% vs expected
Tanya Hernadi + Barb Evans9556% games+5.5% vs expected
Tanya Hernadi + Briana Schrieber5159% games+4.8% vs expected
Barb Evans + Suzanne Rackleff8164% games+3.4% vs expected
Michelle Hackett + Suzanne Rackleff4453% games+2.2% vs expected
Tatum Hay + Kathryn Jessogne1445% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eleanor Doyle
96W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Andrea Hayes
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Winters
52W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
Suzanne Rackleff
60W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Barb Evans
143W–115L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Briana Schrieber
56W–58L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Tanya Hernadi
76W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
Lindsey Poole
49W–62L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Kathryn Jessogne
26W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Tatum Hay
29W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Julie Cyran
64W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerry Fesperman
31W–60L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meagan Jacobs-Irwin
55W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Hackett
23W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Cooper
21W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.