Teams

GEPTA/Adult 4.0W/Missirian/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Angelica Ares
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
Erika Licon
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Karla Nahomi Marroquin
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published
Linda Rowse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Marcelle Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Marisa Porras
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Melissa Isaac
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published
Niria Yepo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Paula Prado
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Rosanna Missirian
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Vanessa Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Veronica Perusquia
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Xochitl Benitez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Zulem Bordier
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zulem Bordier + Erika Licon9457% games+11.1% vs expected
Rosanna Missirian + Erika Licon8953% games−6.2% vs expected
Marisa Porras + Erika Licon9261% gamesnot enough data
Vanessa Herrera + Melissa Isaac3451% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Porras + Paula Prado3354% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Porras + Niria Yepo4251% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Porras + Rosanna Missirian3354% gamesnot enough data
Vanessa Herrera + Rosanna Missirian4265% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angelica Ares
65W–58L career · 7 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Erika Licon
75W–59L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karla Nahomi Marroquin
18W–8L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Rowse
41W–17L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcelle Fernandez
25W–11L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marisa Porras
94W–54L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Isaac
107W–104L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Niria Yepo
43W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Prado
42W–46L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosanna Missirian
111W–86L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Herrera
47W–66L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Perusquia
20W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Xochitl Benitez
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zulem Bordier
95W–63L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.