Teams

Stoneleigh- Comienski 2.5

2025 Loudoun Singles · Loudoun Singles 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-20vs Creighton Farms- SherryWon 10
W#1 SinglesCameron Comienski vs Rebecca McDonald6-1, 6-1
2025-10-16vs Creighton Farms- SherryWon 20
W#1 SinglesChristine Bartlett vs Krista Magalhaes5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCameron Comienski vs Vanessa Moore6-0, 6-0
2025-10-13vs Creighton Farms- SherrySplit 11
L#2 SinglesChristine Bartlett vs Krista Magalhaes7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCameron Comienski vs Sandra Kim6-3, 6-3
2025-10-06vs Creighton Farms- SherryWon 10
W#2 SinglesCameron Comienski vs Rebecca McDonald6-0, 6-0
2025-09-29vs Creighton Farms- SherryWon 10
W#3 SinglesCameron Comienski vs Vanessa Moore6-1, 6-0
2025-09-24vs Creighton Farms- SherryWon 10
W#1 SinglesCameron Comienski vs Krista Magalhaes6-1, 6-1
2025-09-22vs Creighton Farms- SherryWon 10
W#3 SinglesJacy Everling vs Sandra Kim6-3, 6-0
2025-09-15vs Creighton Farms- SherrySplit 11
L#1 SinglesJacy Everling vs Jessica Saleck2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesCameron Comienski vs Sandra Kim6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Singles 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Cameron Comienski
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3
2.54
Jacy Everling
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.48
Tina Vanderhurst
published
Aimee McGranahan
published 2.5
2.06
Christine Bartlett
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Patricia Neiss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Bartlett + Tina Vanderhurst123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cameron Comienski
49W–34L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Jacy Everling
44W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Tina Vanderhurst
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.48
2.5
Aimee McGranahan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Christine Bartlett
11W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Patricia Neiss
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.