Teams

Blevins TOCC

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-19vs BBTC/KnightWon 30
W#1 SinglesKara Blevins vs Amy Knight6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMolly Pittman vs Tina Murray6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSandy Gaskill vs Sam Allen7-6, 6-4
2024-12-16vs BBTC/KnightLost 12
L#1 SinglesTaylor Pilger vs Sam Allen3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesVirginia Lang vs Lauren Patin2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesKara Blevins vs Jode' Braxton6-1, 6-1
2024-12-11vs BBTC-MATTHEWSLost 12
L#1 SinglesMolly Pittman vs Brianna Beesley6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSarah Hults vs Stacey Rishel6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesVirginia Lang vs Lauren Ray6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-11-21vs Gartman-BiloxiSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSarah Hults vs Delynsi Che3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKara Blevins vs Kelly Robinson6-2, 6-1
2024-11-20vs OSTC - VoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKara Blevins vs Crystal Harper2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSandy Gaskill vs Angela Vo7-5, 6-4
2024-11-14vs Gartman-BiloxiWon 30
W#1 SinglesMolly Pittman vs Janet Blythe6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Hults vs Alison Campbell6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKara Blevins vs Robyn Johnson6-4, 6-1
2024-11-07vs BBTC-MATTHEWSWon 20
W#1 SinglesSarah Hults vs Maggie Day7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesVirginia Lang vs Stacey Rishel7-5, 7-5
2024-10-24vs OSTC - VoWon 30
W#1 SinglesHannah Hults vs Angela Vo6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKara Blevins vs Kelly Pilger6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesSandy Gaskill vs Ashley Smith4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hannah Hults
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Kara Blevins
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.18
Molly Pittman
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.88
Taylor Pilger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sandy Gaskill
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Sarah Hults
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Virginia Lang
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Hults + Sarah Hults134 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Hults + Molly Pittman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Hults
24W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kara Blevins
84W–54L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.18
Molly Pittman
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Taylor Pilger
16W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
Sandy Gaskill
16W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Hults
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Virginia Lang
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.