Teams

Pretzsch 40s 4.0

2022 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-05vs BECK 40s 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnette Schmidt / Marian Hogan vs Glenda Burkett / Kathy Chinnis6-3, 6-4
2022-04-28vs Easley 40s 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelaney Gee / Marian Hogan vs Ginger Hayworth / Jill Elam4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-24vs Kinard/Hendricks 40s 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesNan Elizabeth Joyce / Marian Hogan vs Emmy Biaggi / Beverly Burke6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-10vs WARRICK 40s 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Doe / Marian Hogan vs Lynn Jacoby / Karen Robinson0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Marian Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.50
Nan Elizabeth Joyce
published
3.41
Melaney Gee
published
3.33
Vangie Cruz
published
3.25
Nell Pretzsch
published
3.13
Carrie Tauber
published 3.5
3.08
Lisa Cassidy
published
3.05
Sallie Bett Theall
published
3.02
Sarah Witherspoon
published
2.83
Alisa Miller
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nan Elizabeth Joyce + Vangie Cruz3352% games+1.7% vs expected
Nell Pretzsch + Carrie Tauber1435% gamesnot enough data
Sallie Bett Theall + Carrie Tauber213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marian Hogan
128W–54L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.61
Nan Elizabeth Joyce
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
Melaney Gee
35W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Vangie Cruz
21W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Nell Pretzsch
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Carrie Tauber
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Lisa Cassidy
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Sallie Bett Theall
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
Sarah Witherspoon
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Alisa Miller
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.