Teams

BP ORANGE

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

12 players · average NTRP 4.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-14vs SS-LGT YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesCasey Ahrendsen / Mary Nelson vs Rachel Frisz / Katherine Richey6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristi Valicenti vs Lauren Koski5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Irene Arguelles vs Dagmar Velez / Mandy Paul6-7, 5-7
2025-09-02vs SS-LGT PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Nelson / Talia Cioth vs Shannon Kiebler / Emily Oermann3-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Philleo vs Laura Kannaka3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Rosemary Garcia vs Megan Melucci / Susan McGarry4-6, 5-7
2025-08-19vs LTC-M NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeslie Lane / Meg Staebell vs Mary Brennan / Taryn Fleming5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTalia Cioth vs Melissa Louie6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Irene Arguelles vs Denise Belk / McCall Board3-6, 0-6
2025-08-12vs LTC-M GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Lane / Meg Staebell vs Shellie Hall / Ajyra JONES6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTalia Cioth vs K Autumn Hartley6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesIrene Arguelles / Mary Nelson vs Michelle Phenicie / Michelle Wadas2-6, 1-6
2025-08-05vs KC-RH BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesTalia Cioth / Mary Nelson vs Mikaela Potter / Meghan Geisler6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristi Valicenti vs Grace Koza5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRosemary Garcia / Yukiko Brooks vs Radhika Acharya-Leon / Margaret Lamb6-7, 1-6
2025-07-29vs SS-LGT PURPLELost 12
W#1 DoublesCasey Ahrendsen / Denise Hernandez vs Megan Melucci / Leigh Hardin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristi Valicenti vs Laura Kannaka4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRosemary Garcia / Yukiko Brooks vs Kristin Danford / Emily Oermann4-6, 2-6
2025-07-22vs SS-LGT YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesCasey Ahrendsen / Denise Hernandez vs Marcela Rascon / Katherine Richey6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Rhoad vs Dagmar Velez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Lane / Meg Staebell vs Carla Bidwell / Jamie Steese6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Casey Ahrendsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Talia Cioth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Charlotte Rhoad
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Meg Staebell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Leslie Lane
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.14
Denise Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Rosemary Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Andrea Philleo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Christi Valicenti
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Yukiko Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Mary Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Irene Arguelles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Staebell + Leslie Lane10358% games+8.4% vs expected
Denise Hernandez + Casey Ahrendsen2551% games+1.1% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Andrea Philleo2346% games−0.5% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Yukiko Brooks3846% games−1.4% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Talia Cioth4644% games−5.7% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Meg Staebell2442% games−6.1% vs expected
Denise Hernandez + Irene Arguelles3745% games−8.8% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Yukiko Brooks2634% games−16.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Casey Ahrendsen
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.36
4.5
Talia Cioth
74W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Charlotte Rhoad
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Meg Staebell
71W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Leslie Lane
29W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Denise Hernandez
14W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Rosemary Garcia
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Andrea Philleo
52W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Christi Valicenti
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Mary Nelson
29W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Irene Arguelles
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.