Teams

Turner/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.0 Women 18 & over

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-01vs LaBonia/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesMary Marshall Fenton / Callie Mejia vs Gaby Orta / Liya Yakupova6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLana Holmes vs Carolyn Labonia2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusannah Mays / Emily Weller vs Gwendolyn Mrva / Laura Layton6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKaci Turner vs Chelsea Jewell2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Lackie / Maureen Esposito vs Diana Galdieri / Kelly Baker0-6, 2-6
2025-04-24vs Moore/MemphisWon 32
L#1 DoublesRachel Young / Susannah Mays vs Sarah Holtgrewe / Amanda Scott3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Weller vs Ashley Elder4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Reed / Jenay Boggs vs Angie Moore / Catherine Brimhall2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCallie Mejia vs Tatiana de la Barrera6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulia McDonald / Anna Avant vs Angela Finerson / Kelly Richardson Dahlgren6-4, 6-4
2025-04-17vs LaBonia/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiana Phillips / Lana Holmes vs Gwendolyn Mrva / Rachel Patterson6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Avant / Lexis Zellner vs Kelly Baker / Diana Galdieri0-6, 2-6
2025-04-08vs Tasker/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesNatalie Hartman / Emily Weller vs Allison Ewing / Michele Thomas0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMary Marshall Fenton vs Hallie Bauer6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLana Holmes / Catherine Lackie vs Ami Tasker / Tanya Myers0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMaureen Esposito vs Sally Gillum0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJenay Boggs / Callie Mejia vs Caitlyn Arkwright / Andrea Harano6-4, 6-3
2025-03-25vs Moore/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesNatalie Meagle / Kaci Turner vs Amanda Scott / Angie Moore7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDiana Phillips vs Catherine Brimhall4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Weller / Rachel Young vs Jenny Harmeier / Sarah Holtgrewe4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Avant vs Tatiana de la Barrera4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMary Marshall Fenton / Susannah Mays vs Ashley Elder / Kelly Richardson Dahlgren2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Callie Mejia
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.76
Diana Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Jenay Boggs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Mary Marshall Fenton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.65
Natalie Meagle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Catherine Lackie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Kaci Turner
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Lana Holmes
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Susannah Mays
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.48
Anna Avant
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.38
Maureen Esposito
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Emily Weller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Lexis Zellner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Lackie + Anna Avant3351% gamesnot enough data
Diana Phillips + Callie Mejia404 matchesnot enough data
Mary Marshall Fenton + Callie Mejia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Callie Mejia
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Diana Phillips
20W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Jenay Boggs
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Mary Marshall Fenton
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Natalie Meagle
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Catherine Lackie
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Kaci Turner
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Lana Holmes
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Susannah Mays
20W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
3
Anna Avant
15W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Maureen Esposito
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.38
Emily Weller
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lexis Zellner
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.