Teams

JByrd40-DUR

2025 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-05vs SNarayan-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesYoungjun Lee / Richard McClenny vs Zachary Osofsky / Sudhanshu Handa4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-23vs EAnderson-DFCWon 10
W#2 DoublesRichard McClenny / Youngjun Lee vs Edmund Malesky / Nick Buchler6-3, 6-4
2025-08-24vs SNarayan-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesRichard McClenny / Seunghyun Hwang vs Jason Moon / Scott Benson6-2, 7-5
2025-08-21vs MPiland-HRWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard McClenny / Youngjun Lee vs David Slack / Jeffrey Clough6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Richard McClenny
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Patrick Shields
published
Ben Cooke
published 4.5
Blake Hutchinson
published 4.5
D Curtis Lawson
published 4.5
4.14
Guillermo Velarde
published
4.06
Youngjun Lee
published
4.05
Eric Roller
published
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
published 4.5
3.88
3.83
Seth Layton
published
3.81
James Klemenz
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.80
Ryan Kessler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Shields + Richard McClenny9359% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Richard McClenny
429W–129L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
Patrick Shields
40W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Ben Cooke
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Blake Hutchinson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
D Curtis Lawson
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Guillermo Velarde
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Youngjun Lee
31W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.06
Eric Roller
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
Manuel Mariategui Vargas
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.88
Seth Layton
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
James Klemenz
188W–132L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Ryan Kessler
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.