Teams

KY/LEX/Hasler

2022 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Marisol Valles
published
3.83
Anne Faulconer
published 4
3.83
Beth Mendenhall
published 4
3.80
Melanie Kilpatrick
published
3.73
Holly Hasler
published 4
3.60
Cindy Bramble
published 4
3.50
Ellen Miller
published 4
3.41
Janine Coy
published
3.27
Nancy Bailey
published
3.23
Mily Ralsten
published
Julie Klier
published
Karen Lingreen
published
Laura Leitsch
published
Marci Boston
published
Mary Jouet
published
Terri Biggers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Miller + Cindy Bramble303 matchesnot enough data
Anne Faulconer + Cindy Bramble213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marisol Valles
40W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Anne Faulconer
45W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Beth Mendenhall
21W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.83
Melanie Kilpatrick
16W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Holly Hasler
25W–18L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cindy Bramble
33W–53L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Ellen Miller
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
Janine Coy
102W–61L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Nancy Bailey
39W–36L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Mily Ralsten
25W–30L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Julie Klier
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Lingreen
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Leitsch
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marci Boston
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Jouet
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terri Biggers
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.