Teams

8 Tornabene SCC Sal’s Berries

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-17vs 12 Southampton BrownLost 01
L#2 DoublesJann Clarke / Julie Kearfott vs Alice Ulrichs / Beth Stafford3-6, 1-6
2022-07-16vs 3 ACAC Kellner/KrebsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Tamsin Hepner vs Lori Epps / Brittany Krebs5-7, 0-6
2022-07-09vs 4 Woodlake PoindexterLost 01
L#1 SinglesJulie Kearfott vs Cindy Birnbaum4-6, 4-6
2022-06-18vs 11 MRTC Battery Park HawleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Melissa Brunner-Brown vs Tina Carter / Clarissa McDonough6-1, 6-3
2022-06-11vs 9 Burkwood ClarkLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Stacey Piotrowski vs Donna Mourtzakis / Modestine Carter6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Kendall Consolvo
published
3.53
Becky McNeer
published 3.5
3.40
Mandy Tornabene
published
3.33
Julie Kearfott
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Laura Booberg
published
Beth Phipps
published 3.5
3.19
Robin Sorensen
published
3.13
Julie Nobles
published
3.09
3.06
Jessica Steinour
published
3.04
Stacey Piotrowski
published
2.78
Tamsin Hepner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Piotrowski + Melissa Brunner-Brown224 matchesnot enough data
Becky McNeer + Julie Nobles224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendall Consolvo
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Becky McNeer
30W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.53
Mandy Tornabene
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Julie Kearfott
146W–104L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Laura Booberg
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Beth Phipps
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Sorensen
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Julie Nobles
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Melissa Brunner-Brown
11W–22L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Jessica Steinour
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Stacey Piotrowski
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Tamsin Hepner
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.