Teams

F.SUN/SHUEY

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-10vs L.BrockWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrian Hardwick vs W Troutman6-2, 7-6
2023-05-01vs F.AllisonLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Hardwick / Randy Poteat vs Jeff Chaffin / Joseph Smith4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-04-26vs J.Jones 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDale Lambe / Edward Maginnis vs Tyler Salisbury / John Gearing0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrian Hardwick vs Neil Hauge3-6, 3-6
2023-04-19vs T.SherburneLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Shuey / Eric Rubin vs Seb Heese / Robert Weaver3-6, 2-6
2023-03-22vs J.DiamondSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDale Lambe / Edward Maginnis vs Ken Glanville / Steven Miller6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSpence Huffstetler / Mark Wood vs Ken Lawton / Tom Sparks0-6, 1-6
2023-03-15vs L.BrockLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrian Hardwick vs W Troutman3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDale Lambe / Edward Maginnis vs David Hill / Jonathan Jenkins4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Dale Lambe
published 4
3.61
Brian Hardwick
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Randy Poteat
published
3.57
Francis Sun
published 4
3.44
Edward Maginnis
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Paul Shuey
published
3.37
Mark Wood
published
3.37
Spence Huffstetler
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Eric Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Michael Ciuffo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Maginnis + Spence Huffstetler4448% gamesnot enough data
Eric Rubin + Spence Huffstetler213 matchesnot enough data
Brian Hardwick + Spence Huffstetler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dale Lambe
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Brian Hardwick
49W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Randy Poteat
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.57
4
Francis Sun
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Edward Maginnis
61W–79L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Paul Shuey
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.38
Mark Wood
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Spence Huffstetler
65W–73L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Eric Rubin
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
Michael Ciuffo
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.