Teams

Kimble, Paul

2026 Combo 40 & Over-JXN · Men 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Imran, MoinWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Kimble / Michael Collins vs Scott Holston / Austin O'Brien7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Adams / Mitch Evans vs Phillip Pace / Dario Rosa6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJay Irving / Nico Jimeno vs Graham Bucciantini / Randy Harris6-2, 7-5
2026-08-20vs Walker, NivenLost 03
L#1 DoublesRussell Dendy / Paul Kimble vs Andrew Stubbs / Roddy Rumbley6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Adams / Stephen Langley vs Adam Byrd / Paige Purvis7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBen Berry / Jay Irving vs Jonathan Sims / Chandler Strain5-7, 2-6
2026-08-05vs Imran, MoinWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Kimble / Kevin McKay vs Akhilesh Ganti / Greg Williamson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Adams / Mitch Evans vs Jeffrey Martin / Jeremy Self6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Collins / Nico Jimeno vs Foster Jordan / Moin Imran6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Walker, Niven1030019
2Kimble, Paul1030015
3Imran, Moin02061274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kevin McKay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Russell Dendy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Mitch Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Nico Jimeno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Jay Irving
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Derek Howard
published 4
3.21
Paul Kimble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Nick Morgan
published
3.14
Ben Berry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Stephen Langley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Michael Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Tommy Gray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin McKay + Stephen Langley3252% gamesnot enough data
Kevin McKay + Jay Irving224 matchesnot enough data
Kevin McKay + Michael Collins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin McKay
17W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Russell Dendy
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Mitch Evans
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Nico Jimeno
42W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Jay Irving
30W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
4
Derek Howard
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.24
Paul Kimble
29W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
Nick Morgan
39W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.20
3.5
Ben Berry
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Stephen Langley
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
Michael Collins
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Tommy Gray
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.