Teams

Game Changers

2024 Montgomery Adult 40 & Over · Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-03-28vs Mid-Atlantic/Munshell/40&Over3.5MWon 10
W#2 DoublesJin-Gu Lee / Jin Soh vs Tim Munshell / Daniel Mandl7-5, 6-2
2024-03-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesJin-Gu Lee / Jin Soh vs Brian Krantz / Tony Ryan6-2, 6-2
2024-03-12vs Hit MenLost 01
L#3 DoublesInsung Kang / Jin Soh vs Dileep Nair / Carlos Heard3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-03-09vs String TheoryWon 10
W#3 DoublesInsung Kang / Jin Soh vs Joe Ostoyich / Dominik Cieslak6-3, 6-2
2024-03-01vs Mid-Atlantic/Munshell/40&Over3.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesJin Soh / Hyung Joon Kwon vs Matt Baumann / Sandeep Duvedi3-6, 2-6
2024-02-29vs DefendersWon 10
W#2 DoublesChan Young Jung / Jin Soh vs David Glasgow / Bassem Melhem3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-26vs Hit MenLost 01
L#3 DoublesYoung Seung Kim / Jin Soh vs Andrew Norris / Carlos Heard6-7, 2-6
2024-02-17vs String TheoryWon 10
W#3 DoublesJin Soh / Insung Kang vs Ivan Teelucksingh / John Francis6-1, 6-1
2024-01-26vs Mid-Atlantic/Munshell/40&Over3.5MWon 10
W#3 DoublesJaeil Ahn / Jin Soh vs Tim Munshell / John Deleonibus6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-01-22vs DefendersLost 01
L#2 DoublesJin Soh / Hyung Joon Kwon vs James Smith / Konrad Huppi1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-01-10vs String TheoryWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeeho Lee / Jin Soh vs Jay Kim / Taft Irons6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Jeeho Lee
published
3.40
Jin-Gu Lee
published
3.29
Chan Young Jung
published 3.5
3.29
Jaeil Ahn
published
3.25
Jin Soh
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.14
Paul Song
published
3.13
Insung Kang
published
3.07
Young Seung Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Young Seung Kim + Insung Kang2446% games+0.9% vs expected
Jin Soh + Young Seung Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Jin Soh + Jin-Gu Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeeho Lee
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jin-Gu Lee
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Chan Young Jung
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Jaeil Ahn
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Jin Soh
58W–47L career · 11 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Paul Song
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Insung Kang
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Young Seung Kim
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.