Teams

Yager

2021 Neb. Adult 40&Over · 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-01vs NE/Allison-Wyse/40&over4.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesJill Irwin / Holly Christoffels vs Jennifer Allison / Donna Wyse2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJennifer Lindner vs Michelle Gifford2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Gradoville / Michelle Lisec-Talarico vs Katherine Hawkins / Susan Sloboth3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Jensen / Shannon Churchill vs Shannon Dombrowski / Christine Veitzer3-6, 2-6
2021-04-24vs WaltonWon 31
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lisec-Talarico / Julie Obear vs Victoria Leigh Glesmann / Denise Hazelrigg6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Flood vs Anastasia Kyvelidou2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJill Irwin / Holly Christoffels vs Tory Jorgensen / Linda Walton6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCathy Fluckey / Andrea Jensen vs Kim Spurgeon / Jennifer Rich6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-04-10vs NE/Allison-Wyse/40&over4.5WLost 13
W#1 DoublesKatie Garcia / Julie Obear vs Jennifer Allison / Michelle Gifford6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesStephanie Eells vs Sara McArdle1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Gradoville / Shannon Churchill vs Brittni Redding / Kim Miksich1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Smith / Michelle Lisec-Talarico vs Katherine Hawkins / Susan Sloboth3-6, 2-6
2021-03-27vs WaltonWon 40
W#1 DoublesCathy Fluckey / Shannon Churchill vs Kim Spurgeon / Tammy Weber7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesStephanie Eells vs Anastasia Kyvelidou6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Lisec-Talarico / Kimberly Gradoville vs Denise Hazelrigg / Sheryl Vaughn7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Obear / Lisa Smith vs Tory Jorgensen / Kay Merkel6-1, 7-5
2021-03-13vs NE/Allison-Wyse/40&over4.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesKatie Garcia / Julie Obear vs Jennifer Allison / Michelle Gifford6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Flood vs Andria Louis5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJill Irwin / Jennifer Lindner vs Brittni Redding / Kim Miksich4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Eells / Lisa Smith vs Christine Veitzer / Sara McArdle3-6, 3-6
2021-03-06vs WaltonWon 40
W#1 DoublesJulie Obear / Katie Garcia vs Tory Jorgensen / Linda Walton6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesStephanie Eells vs Natalie Simmonds6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathy Fluckey / Lisa Smith vs Tammy Weber / Kim Spurgeon6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJill Irwin / Andrea Jensen vs Jennifer Rich / Kay Merkel6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Allison-Wyse/40&over4.5W602226133
2Yager33121225213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Andrea Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Katie Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Julie Obear
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.09
Stephanie Eells
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.05
Michelle Lisec-Talarico
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.00
Jennifer Lindner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.85
Cathy Fluckey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Shannon Churchill
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Jill Irwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.76
Elizabeth Flood
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Holly Christoffels
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.67
Kimberly Gradoville
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Garcia + Julie Obear5358% games+9.6% vs expected
Michelle Lisec-Talarico + Kimberly Gradoville2451% games+2.5% vs expected
Shannon Churchill + Andrea Jensen5847% games−2.4% vs expected
Julie Obear + Michelle Lisec-Talarico2349% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Gradoville + Elizabeth Flood1442% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Eells + Julie Obear224 matchesnot enough data
Holly Christoffels + Jill Irwin134 matchesnot enough data
Jill Irwin + Shannon Churchill224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrea Jensen
83W–67L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
4.34
Katie Garcia
24W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.21
Julie Obear
100W–55L career · 5 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
4.14
Stephanie Eells
48W–40L career · 4 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
4.09
Michelle Lisec-Talarico
48W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
4.05
Jennifer Lindner
57W–52L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Cathy Fluckey
65W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
Shannon Churchill
24W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.84
Jill Irwin
53W–34L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Elizabeth Flood
75W–40L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Holly Christoffels
66W–51L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Kimberly Gradoville
79W–148L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.