Teams

KRA Page

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.14 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Melanie Spears
published
3.48
Krista Quinby
published
3.39
Melissa Berrey
published
3.38
Ginny Boland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Camp August
published 3.5
3.18
Jenny Hanna
published
3.13
Julie Shudtz
published
3.04
Kindra Kirkeby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Britta Janney
published 3
2.91
Lindsay Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
2.81
Ashley Page
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Heather DeBolt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Mandy Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Anne Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krista Quinby + Ginny Boland2352% gamesnot enough data
Krista Quinby + Melissa Berrey224 matchesnot enough data
Heather DeBolt + Lindsay Daniel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Spears
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.62
Krista Quinby
18W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Melissa Berrey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Ginny Boland
36W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Camp August
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Jenny Hanna
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Julie Shudtz
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Kindra Kirkeby
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Britta Janney
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Lindsay Daniel
29W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Ellen Featherstone
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Ashley Page
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Heather DeBolt
24W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Mandy Miller
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Anne Walker
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.