Teams

Sawgrass - Wright

2023 Duval Trilevel Women · 4.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_2

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Sherill Herzfeld
published
3.65
Lisa Pella
published
3.47
Christina Felsing
published 3.5
3.44
Aisling Toby
published 3.5
3.43
Alicia Sprecher
published 3.5
3.38
Lorrayne Carless
published
3.33
Julie Barney
published
3.33
Danielle Wright
published 3.5
3.32
Mary Coban
published
3.31
Lindsay Long
published
3.31
Mary Anne Orenchuk
published
3.30
Gelila Jones
published 3
3.29
Terry Heard
published
3.29
Erica Chigounis
published 3.5
3.23
Stacy Rendzio
published
3.20
Vanessa Sutliff
published
3.19
Betsy Delcour
published 3
3.13
Jennifer Werba
published
3.02
Heather Quick
published 3.5
2.94
Joan Grune
published
2.77
Francine Serur
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorrayne Carless + Aisling Toby3344% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Pella + Aisling Toby224 matchesnot enough data
Lorrayne Carless + Erica Chigounis303 matchesnot enough data
Lorrayne Carless + Christina Felsing213 matchesnot enough data
Aisling Toby + Joan Grune213 matchesnot enough data
Aisling Toby + Alicia Sprecher213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Coban + Julie Barney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherill Herzfeld
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Lisa Pella
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.65
3.5
Christina Felsing
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Aisling Toby
30W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Alicia Sprecher
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
Lorrayne Carless
18W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Julie Barney
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.33
3.5
Danielle Wright
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Mary Coban
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.32
Lindsay Long
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Mary Anne Orenchuk
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Gelila Jones
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.30
Terry Heard
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.29
3.5
Erica Chigounis
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Stacy Rendzio
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Vanessa Sutliff
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Betsy Delcour
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.19
Jennifer Werba
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Heather Quick
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Joan Grune
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Francine Serur
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.