Teams

Biloxi - Boleware

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over-GC · Men 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 10 7:30 PM
at BBTC - Matthews
Bayou Bluff Tennis Club
Sep 15 7:30 PM
vs TOCC-McMillan
Biloxi Tennis Complex
Sep 17 7:30 PM
Biloxi Tennis Complex
Sep 22 7:30 PM
vs BBTC - Matthews
Biloxi Tennis Complex
Sep 24 7:30 PM
Bayou Bluff Tennis Club
2026-08-06vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 6.5 MENWon 20
W#1 DoublesMatthew Borne / Matthew SooHoo vs Truitt Cotman / Drew Harrell6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesQuochuy Nhan / Khoa Nguyen vs Steven Creel / Jim Atchison6-1, 6-1
2026-07-29vs BBTC - Colbet/PatinLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Borne / Matthew SooHoo vs Gage Switzer / Tyler Patin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesQuochuy Nhan / Connor Boleware vs Ethan Thomas / Johnny Frazier3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Ly / Robert Mills vs Stuart Munn / Asa Barnes4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Men 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Colbet/Patin2051343
2BBTC - Mixon 6.5 18+1030015
3Biloxi - Boleware1142542
4OSTC - Frierson11241066
5BBTC-MATTHEWS 6.5 MEN12361281
6Taylormade - IG Levy000000
7TOCC - Radius 6.5 18+ 202602151167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Matthew Borne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Quochuy Nhan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Bruce Ly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Wayne Dinh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Lindsay Rosenblatt
published
2.97
Connor Boleware
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.96
Matthew SooHoo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Joe Mitchell
published
2.47
Robert Mills
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew SooHoo + Bruce Ly8265% games+15.8% vs expected
Connor Boleware + Matthew SooHoo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Borne
30W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.58
Quochuy Nhan
23W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.34
3.5
Bruce Ly
30W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Wayne Dinh
26W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Lindsay Rosenblatt
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Connor Boleware
41W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Matthew SooHoo
26W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Joe Mitchell
37W–57L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Robert Mills
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.