Teams

Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5A-DT

2021 ADULT 18 & Over Daytime · Women 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Kym Dawid
published
3.68
Debbie Alster
published 4
3.63
Viviana Meyer
published
3.62
Huijuan Wang
published 4
3.40
Sunita Mistry
published
3.36
Camille Schulz
published 4
3.33
Katherine Ryan
published
3.28
Dawn Greenaway
published 3.5
3.27
Yolla Elahmadie
published
Ali Rago
published 3.5
3.19
Nanny Tunnell
published
3.14
Trish Nornhold
published
3.13
Lea Baldacci
published
3.02
Christi Deakin
published 3.5
Jana Vojdani
published
Rachel Gilchrist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sunita Mistry + Viviana Meyer5255% games+6.5% vs expected
Rachel Gilchrist + Trish Nornhold033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kym Dawid
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Debbie Alster
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Viviana Meyer
13W–13L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Huijuan Wang
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.62
Sunita Mistry
18W–14L career · no lines in 2021
78%22%<1%
3.40
4
Camille Schulz
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
3.36
Katherine Ryan
13W–12L career · no lines in 2021
90%10%<1%
3.33
3.5
Dawn Greenaway
16W–22L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
Yolla Elahmadie
5W–17L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ali Rago
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nanny Tunnell
4W–15L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Trish Nornhold
5W–13L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.14
Lea Baldacci
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Christi Deakin
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
Jana Vojdani
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rachel Gilchrist
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.