Teams

Park Fit Club-Thunderball

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-20vs EW-PEAK-QuallsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteven Douglas / Chris Ryan vs Doug Conboy / John Williams4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDon Ho / Jorge Pinos vs Glen Satre / Guy Schneider6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCraig Hart / Richard Splichal vs Kevin Tweed / Mark Jackson2-6, 3-6
2024-10-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Douglas / Chris Ryan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-18vs HRAC-ColumbiaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJorge Pinos / Richard Splichal vs Peter Rysavy / Craig Sabina6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChris Ryan / Craig Hart vs David Gordon / Revell Coy4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKevin Kuhlmann / Don Ho vs Dan Sager / Jim Pritchard6-1, 6-4
2024-10-18vs EW-YTC-DeGrasseLost 12
W#1 DoublesCraig Hart / Chris Ryan vs David Elofson / Wally Morrison6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDon Ho / Richard Splichal vs Jim Stewart / Richard Lozano5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJorge Pinos / Kevin Kuhlmann vs Eric Anderson / Danny Mullins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PEAK-Qualls40120250
2EW-YTC-DeGrasse31841080
3Park Fit Club-Thunderball22661285
4HRAC-Columbia134816103
5CBRC-So Easy0401224144

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Steven Douglas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Chris Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Craig Hart
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Jorge Pinos
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Don Ho
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kevin Kuhlmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Splichal
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Ryan + Craig Hart5449% gamesnot enough data
Richard Splichal + Chris Ryan4345% gamesnot enough data
Chris Ryan + Steven Douglas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Douglas
17W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Chris Ryan
50W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Craig Hart
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jorge Pinos
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Don Ho
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Kuhlmann
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Splichal
12W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.