Teams

Netherland

2024 Tri-Level 40 & Over-SW · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-08-03vs FisherLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Hay / Marlene Cupit vs Carol Easley / Mary Miller5-7, 1-6
2024-07-25vs BrookhavenWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Townsend / Leah Stewart vs Beth Smith / Lisa Breazeale6-1, 6-4
2024-07-02vs FisherLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandy Winborne / Katie Cole vs Missy Kilpatrick / Leah Stewart0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Netherland000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Stacie Rector
published
3.81
Mary Beth Cantrell
published
3.74
Jennifer Otto
published
3.67
Ginny Dehart
published 4.5
3.41
Jennifer Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Britt
published 3.5
3.25
Amanda Galey
published 3.5
3.15
Rockie Netherland
published
Leslie Branning
published
Marlene Cupit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Winborne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginny Dehart + Jennifer Otto1541% gamesnot enough data
Mary Beth Cantrell + Jennifer Otto314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacie Rector
33W–42L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Mary Beth Cantrell
64W–62L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Jennifer Otto
71W–48L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4.5
Ginny Dehart
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.67
Jennifer Townsend
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Heather Britt
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Amanda Galey
39W–44L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Rockie Netherland
4W–22L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
Leslie Branning
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marlene Cupit
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sandy Winborne
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.