Teams

N OR-LCC-Juppenlatz

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 10.0 Mixed

4 players · average NTRP 5.12 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Stephen Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5.5
Marcus Eyth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
Sanja Lemes
published 5
Stephanie Paulson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
Results5 ties
2023-07-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesStephen Robertson / Stephanie Paulson vs Tamra Godfrey / Stefan Bach6-4, 7-6
2022-11-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnne Borus / Marcus Eyth vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Robertson / Stephanie Paulson vs Sean Eberle / Caitlin Eberle7-5, 6-4
2022-10-30Split 11
L#1 DoublesTanya O'Neil / Marcus Eyth vs Katie Petersen / Vetu Mam6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStephanie Paulson / Stephen Robertson vs Caitlin Eberle / Peter Dusicka6-4, 6-0
2022-10-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesStephen Robertson / Stephanie Paulson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5.5
Stephen Robertson
74W–5L career · type S
not enough data
5
Marcus Eyth
11W–28L career
not enough data
5
Sanja Lemes
25W–13L career
not enough data
5
Stephanie Paulson
119W–43L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.