Teams

Hollis/Whitson/Nashville

2026 Mixed 65 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Mixed - Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-11vs Smith/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Kreis / Merrily Gibney vs Glenda Jordan / Steven Anderson6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlbert Whitson / Celia Turner vs Roger Fuhrman / Lolo Fuhrman1-6, 3-6
2026-06-27vs Smith/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Ward / Venessa Seivers vs Steve Smith / Julie Shaub6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDebbi Booton / Jack Vandercook vs Rob Rogers / Venette Stack6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Kreis / Merrily Gibney vs Roger Fuhrman / Lolo Fuhrman2-2
2026-06-20vs Smith/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesJack Vandercook / Debbi Booton vs Mike Burkhart / Joni Covington7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Hayes / Barbara Hooper vs Steven Anderson / Julie Shaub6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Kreis / Merrily Gibney vs Roger Fuhrman / Glenda Jordan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-13vs Smith/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Hayes / Celia Turner vs Norman Moore / Glenda Jordan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Barnes-Tilford / Salvador Barajas vs Mike Burkhart / Joni Covington3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Kreis / Nita Hollis vs Rob Rogers / Venette Stack5-7, 6-7
2026-06-06vs Smith/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesBarbara Hooper / Daniel Hayes vs Norman Moore / Joni Covington7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSalvador Barajas / Jane Barnes-Tilford vs Rob Rogers / Venette Stack2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJack Vandercook / Venessa Seivers vs Roger Fuhrman / Lolo Fuhrman2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Mixed - Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smith/Nashville327815139
2Hollis/Whitson/Nashville238717135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Daniel Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Celia Turner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Debbi Booton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Jack Vandercook
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Venessa Seivers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Barbara Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Albert Whitson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Jane Barnes-Tilford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Nita Hollis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Merrily Gibney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Salvador Barajas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Hayes
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Celia Turner
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Debbi Booton
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Jack Vandercook
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Venessa Seivers
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Barbara Hooper
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Albert Whitson
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Jane Barnes-Tilford
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.39
Nita Hollis
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Merrily Gibney
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Salvador Barajas
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.