Teams

Bartlett/Sherwood/STC

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.70 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-18vs Rutledge/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 SinglesChanda Price vs Micah Shaver6-4, 5-4
W#2 SinglesCasey Bartlett vs Abigail Obana6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMichelle Bruzatori vs Jonna Clark6-2, 6-0
2025-12-16vs Compton/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 SinglesFlorencia Bruzatori vs Cristie Hughes6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesChristi Callaway vs Kelli Rawn2-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesJennifer Compton vs Jordan Gaiser7-5, 6-2
2025-12-10vs Bulmanski/LR/PVCCWon 21
L#1 SinglesJennifer Compton vs Sophie Brandt4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAllison Callahan vs Jennifer Bulmanski4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 SinglesFlorencia Bruzatori vs Heidi Brandt6-1, 6-1
2025-11-20vs Virden/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 SinglesJennifer Compton vs Anne Virden6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesChanda Price vs Paige Shields6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAllison Callahan vs Wendy Dawson6-7, 4-6
2025-11-12vs Gillispie/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 SinglesMichelle Bruzatori vs Elizabeth Gillispie6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCasey Bartlett vs Alison Caballero6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBrady Scruggs vs MacKenzie Cole6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Callahan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.72
Michelle Bruzatori
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.58
Casey Bartlett
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.54
Jennifer Compton
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.44
Florencia Bruzatori
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.41
Chanda Price
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.38
Brady Scruggs
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Christi Callaway
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Florencia Bruzatori + Jennifer Compton3257% games+12.3% vs expected
Florencia Bruzatori + Casey Bartlett1440% gamesnot enough data
Florencia Bruzatori + Michelle Bruzatori213 matchesnot enough data
Casey Bartlett + Chanda Price033 matchesnot enough data
Casey Bartlett + Michelle Bruzatori033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Callahan
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Bruzatori
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Casey Bartlett
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Jennifer Compton
19W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.54
Florencia Bruzatori
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Chanda Price
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.41
2.5
Brady Scruggs
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Christi Callaway
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.