Teams

NIN SB 40&O 3.0 W: SBRC Byrn/Zablocki

NIN SB Adult 40 & Over · NIN SB 40 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesMary Neumann / Meredith Travis vs Margie Witsken / Heidi Hickman3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKelley Watts / Nina Redden vs Kimberly Sieradzki / Ann McCarthy6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Zablocki / Connie Varga vs Margie Witsken / Amy Kuzmic2-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesEmily Zablocki / Nina Redden vs Amy Kuzmic / Heidi Hickman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Ryckeart / June Bibi vs Melissa Tilley / Jennifer Heckel7-6, 7-6
L#1 DoublesEmily Zablocki / Kelley Watts vs Margie Witsken / Whitney D'Haenens6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNina Redden vs Jennifer Heckel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeredith Travis / Carmen MacHaraschwili vs Ann McCarthy / Rachel Oppman4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNina Redden vs Jennifer Heckel0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Zablocki / Kelley Watts vs Whitney D'Haenens / Amy Kuzmic4-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesSusan Bartush / Carmen MacHaraschwili vs Leslie Hoeppner / Kimberly Sieradzki3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesEmily Zablocki / Kathy Ryckeart vs Kathleen Doslak / Tonya Sexton4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesNina Redden vs Leslie Hoeppner4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCarmen MacHaraschwili / Susan Bartush vs Margie Witsken / Rachel Oppman4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNina Redden vs Melissa Tilley6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEmily Zablocki / Kelley Watts vs Kathleen Doslak / Julie Bussan6-1, 6-1
L#4 DoublesMeredith Travis / Kimberly Byrn vs Terez Hein / Joy Lankford6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NIN SB 40 & Over 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN SB 40&O 3.0 W: SBRC McCarthy/Witsken70221330284
2NIN SB 40&O 3.0 W: SBRC Byrn/Zablocki07132249358

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Nina Redden
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.89
Emily Zablocki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
June Bibi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Meredith Travis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Carmen MacHaraschwili
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Kimberly Byrn
published
Lia Niespodziany
published
Susan Bartush
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nina Redden
4W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
Emily Zablocki
78W–61L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
June Bibi
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%17%83%
2.64
Meredith Travis
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
2.5
Carmen MacHaraschwili
16W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Kimberly Byrn
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lia Niespodziany
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Bartush
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.