Teams

CBowman-CHCC

2025 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-17vs MParker-YMCALost 02
L#1 DoublesCynthia Cross / Marybeth Evers vs Lisa Griffin / Jennifer Kuzma3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Koenigshofer / Sara Morgan vs Nancy Draughon / Mary Parker3-6, 6-7
2025-04-04vs DHostetler-HRWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiane Koenigshofer / Christy Bowman vs Marcella Bria / June Mader6-0, 6-1
2025-03-28vs MFitzgerald-ENOWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Koenigshofer / Christy Bowman vs Leah Lee / Dale Martin7-5, 7-5
2025-03-21vs JHagerty-YMCAWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Koenigshofer / Frances Wilson vs Gay Engelbrecht / Seema Krishna Joshi6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-07vs SHerring-HRWon 21
L#1 DoublesTina Cunningham / Sara Morgan vs Karin Yoch / Jennifer Rousseau1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDeon Roach / Monica Jenkins vs Nancy Riefkohl / Patty Mathena3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Cross / Nancy Doorey vs Wendy McCorkle / Mary Panek6-3, 7-5
2025-02-28vs NPike-HVCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeon Roach / Marybeth Evers vs Nancy Pike / Jennifer Pyle5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-26vs VHiguchi-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Koenigshofer / Marybeth Evers vs Regina Davis / Beth Spinarski5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Diane Koenigshofer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Tina Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Frances Wilson
published
3.22
Allison Worthy
published 3.5
3.22
Monica Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Marybeth Evers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Deon Roach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Cynthia Cross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Christy Bowman
published 3
2.70
Sara Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Doorey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marybeth Evers + Diane Koenigshofer134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Koenigshofer
35W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Tina Cunningham
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Frances Wilson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Allison Worthy
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Monica Jenkins
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Marybeth Evers
90W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Deon Roach
2W–13L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
3
Cynthia Cross
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Christy Bowman
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
Sara Morgan
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Nancy Doorey
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.