Teams

Ai-yah!

2023 Adult 18 and Over League · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-08vs Over and InLost 14
L#1 DoublesIris McGuire / Jenna Honda vs Myra Hironaga / Jo Ann Ishida4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Iida vs Mahealani Gomes1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJane Iida / Eunice Hashimoto vs Toni Sakai-Kawada / Gaylien Fujioka2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesShannon Wibberley vs Lynda Dolan5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJun Ishimine / Niko Gagne vs Kerri Okamura / Sherlyn Aronce6-4, 6-3
2023-06-18vs Over and InLost 04
L#1 DoublesIris McGuire / Joy KAMANO vs Toni Sakai-Kawada / Kathy Tsugawa1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesShannon Wibberley vs Lynda Dolan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJenna Honda / Eunice Hashimoto vs Terri Inouye / Amy Yamaki2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJulie Iida vs Mahealani Gomes2-6, 1-6
2023-06-11vs Over and InLost 23
L#1 DoublesJenna Honda / Jun Ishimine vs Amy Yamaki / Lynda Dolan4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Iida vs Mahealani Gomes3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJoy KAMANO / Rebecca Marshall vs Jocelyn Cortez / Ioana Agasa6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesShannon Wibberley vs Judith Pratt6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEunice Hashimoto / Jane Iida vs Terri Inouye / Sherlyn Aronce1-6, 1-6
2023-05-28vs Over and InLost 23
L#1 DoublesJun Ishimine / Gwen Tanaka vs Gaylien Fujioka / Myra Hironaga6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMidori Matsuo vs Jocelyn Cortez7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNiko Gagne / Iris McGuire vs Toni Sakai-Kawada / Kathy Tsugawa3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMari Burns vs Judith Pratt6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEunice Hashimoto / Rebecca Marshall vs Kira Mae / Kerri Okamura4-6, 6-7
2023-05-09vs Over and InLost 14
L#1 DoublesJoy KAMANO / Gwen Tanaka vs Myra Hironaga / Sherlyn Aronce7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMidori Matsuo vs Mahealani Gomes2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMari Burns / Niko Gagne vs Jocelyn Cortez / Kira Mae5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJulie Iida vs Judith Pratt7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJun Ishimine / Jenna Honda vs Jo Ann Ishida / Ioana Agasa6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-04-22vs Over and InLost 23
W#1 DoublesMari Burns / Gwen Tanaka vs Myra Hironaga / Gaylien Fujioka2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMidori Matsuo vs Kathy Tsugawa6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJun Ishimine / Jenna Honda vs Ioana Agasa / Jo Ann Ishida6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJulie Iida vs Amy Yamaki1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesEunice Hashimoto / Jane Iida vs Terri Inouye / Toni Sakai-Kawada6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Over and In6022824245
2Ai-yah!0682245296

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Gwen Tanaka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Mari Burns
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Niko Gagne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Joy KAMANO
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Midori Matsuo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.66
Rebecca Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Jun Ishimine
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
Iris McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Jenna Honda
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.22
Jane Iida
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Eunice Hashimoto
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Julie Iida
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Shannon Wibberley
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eunice Hashimoto + Jane Iida0719% games−18.7% vs expected
Jun Ishimine + Rebecca Marshall123 matchesnot enough data
Jun Ishimine + Niko Gagne303 matchesnot enough data
Jun Ishimine + Jenna Honda033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gwen Tanaka
88W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Mari Burns
27W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
Niko Gagne
55W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
Joy KAMANO
50W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Midori Matsuo
32W–12L career · 6 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
Rebecca Marshall
44W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Jun Ishimine
61W–92L career · 5 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.63
Iris McGuire
22W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58
Jenna Honda
9W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Jane Iida
35W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.22
Eunice Hashimoto
24W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Iida
31W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shannon Wibberley
25W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.