Teams

KRO-na 6.5

2022 Howard Columbia Combo Mixed · Howard Columbia Combo Mixed 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-09-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Limeres / Christian Lee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-24vs I’d Hit That 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Ro / Michelle Limeres vs Angela Helder / Sung Kim3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennie Kim / Christian Lee vs Sean Alewine / Linda Deanto3-6, 7-6
2022-09-16vs Droppin' Shots 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Williams / Michelle Limeres vs Olugbenga Okubadejo / Sanghee Lee6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-08-30vs Lucky Strykes 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChanhee Ro / Christopher Williams vs Brenda Kaechele / Johnny Yataco4-6, 2-6
2022-08-23vs Mixed Nuts 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennie Kim / Kevin Ro vs Geo Pertea / Diane Ruggiero6-4, 6-4
2022-08-20vs I’d Hit That 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesChanhee Ro / Christopher Williams vs George Sybert / Margaret Sybert6-2, 6-4
2022-08-11vs Droppin' Shots 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesChanhee Ro / James Forbes vs Sean Davis / Na Yi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-01vs Birdie 2 Eagle 6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Williams / Michelle Limeres vs Karen Jin / Jean-Philippe Dumont6-0, 6-0
2022-07-25vs Lucky Strykes 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Williams / Kelsey Forbes vs Robert Fox / Brenda Poore6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christopher Lee
published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
published 4
3.46
James Forbes
published 3.5
3.35
Jennie Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christopher Williams
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Peter Hong
published
3.04
Michelle Limeres
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Kevin Ro
published
2.77
Ellen Hong
published 3
2.61
Chanhee Ro
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jin Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Hong + Peter Hong2644% games−4.8% vs expected
Chanhee Ro + Christopher Williams123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Lee
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kelsey Forbes
141W–114L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
James Forbes
25W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Jennie Kim
266W–126L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Christopher Williams
109W–110L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Hong
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Michelle Limeres
106W–105L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.04
Kevin Ro
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Ellen Hong
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Chanhee Ro
117W–136L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.61
Jin Lee
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.