Teams

OC- LLW NBTC - Christina Sat2

2023 OC Tri-Level Mixed · WE 5.0 - 4.5 - 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-28vs OC Coto De Caza - Roxanne-Sun 10Split 11
L#2 DoublesDaniel Tat / Kari Keese vs Alyse Mastropolo / Ajay Ahluwalia6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristopher Contreras / Katie Huyen vs Ulrike Leivici / Eric Kitei7-5, 6-4
2023-09-30vs OC Coto De Caza - Roxanne-Sun 10Won 10
W#2 DoublesKari Keese / Daniel Tat vs Nikki Fermin / Richard Cisakowski6-2, 7-5
2023-08-13vs OC Coto De Caza - Roxanne-Sun 10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard Bennett / Katie Huyen vs Alyse Mastropolo / Shawn Braun6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-07-16vs OC Coto De Caza - Roxanne-Sun 10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Park / Kari Keese vs Nikki Fermin / Ryan Dugan2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WE 5.0 - 4.5 - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.74
4.57
Farrah Northcott
published
4.50
Trina Eggers
published 5
4.49
Paulo Barriga
published 4.5
4.46
Jinna Johnson
published
4.45
Kari Keese
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.43
Kristen Hoppe
published
4.37
TRAM LY
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.28
Daniel Tat
published 4.5
4.19
Kevin Springer
published
3.98
Rachel Tran
published
3.95
Katie Huyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Michael McGee
published
3.36
Lindsay Miller
published
Scott Frick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paulo Barriga + Trina Eggers2351% gamesnot enough data
Michael McGee + Lindsay Miller314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bridget Etchegaray
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.74
Farrah Northcott
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.57
5
Trina Eggers
33W–45L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.50
4.5
Paulo Barriga
107W–48L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
4.49
Jinna Johnson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Kari Keese
95W–35L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
4.45
Kristen Hoppe
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.43
5
TRAM LY
139W–109L career · 6 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.37
4.5
Daniel Tat
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Christopher Contreras
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Springer
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
Rachel Tran
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Katie Huyen
90W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Christina Bennett
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael McGee
26W–17L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
Lindsay Miller
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.36
Scott Frick
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stella Nguyen Bezabeh
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.