Teams

V - Las Posas Shot Girls

2023 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura WD · V - Women 3.0 WD

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-08vs V - Sherwood StarletsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Schomaker / Lisa Zins vs Catharine Chambers / Gail Spayde2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-28vs V - North Ranch Nice AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Zins / Michelle Soto de Carvalho vs Tracy Collins / Leilani O'Keeffe2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Nash / Beverly Torres vs Asheley Mastronardi / Meredith Romero6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJean Salcido / Beverly Torres vs Mary Ann Fermin / Tracy Mancuso3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-02-02vs V - Valle Lindo Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Zins / Dolores Vajcovec vs Anne Renard / Louise Hewitt3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Krista Howard
published
3.21
Shannon Price
published
3.03
Jean Salcido
published
2.84
Beverly Torres
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
2.75
Lisa Zins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Juliet Tamayo
published 3
2.63
Patty Bolland
published
2.60
Mary Nash
published
2.55
Janet Talmadge
published
2.39
Riitta Andonian
published
2.34
Teresa James
published
2.27
Penny Teague
published
Wendy Spasiano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Riitta Andonian + Patty Bolland3444% gamesnot enough data
Juliet Tamayo + Michelle Soto de Carvalho044 matchesnot enough data
Janet Talmadge + Mary Nash033 matchesnot enough data
Juliet Tamayo + Beverly Torres033 matchesnot enough data
Jean Salcido + Beverly Torres213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Krista Howard
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Shannon Price
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Jean Salcido
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Beverly Torres
34W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
Michelle Soto de Carvalho
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Lisa Zins
42W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Colleen Gulbranson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Juliet Tamayo
53W–102L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Patty Bolland
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Mary Nash
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Janet Talmadge
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Riitta Andonian
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.39
Teresa James
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.34
Penny Teague
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
Wendy Spasiano
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.