Teams

GSTL18/Johnson/Grande Dunes

2024 Adult 18 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-04-25vs GSTL18/Smith/PrestwickWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandy McAlpine / Carolyn Capasso vs Rosemary Folk / Linda Tangeman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-29vs GSTL18/Parker/StablesWon 10
W#3 DoublesGayle Berkey / Carolyn Capasso vs Amanda Drosieko / Amanda Davis7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Berry
published 4
Catherine Hill
published 4
3.67
Karen Comeau
published
3.58
Sharon Durant
published
3.52
Denise Watts
published 4
3.51
Anna Kirby
published 4
3.41
Bonnie Trask
published 4
3.40
Carolyn Capasso
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.30
Constance Brophy
published 4
3.26
Gayle Berkey
published
3.20
Sandy McAlpine
published
Janet Mathews
published
Kelle Siegmund
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gayle Berkey + Carolyn Capasso123 matchesnot enough data
Constance Brophy + Carolyn Capasso123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Berry
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Catherine Hill
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Comeau
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.67
Sharon Durant
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.58
4
Denise Watts
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Anna Kirby
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Bonnie Trask
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.41
4
Carolyn Capasso
73W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
4
Constance Brophy
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.30
Gayle Berkey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.26
Sandy McAlpine
2W–24L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.20
Janet Mathews
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelle Siegmund
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.