Teams

WACtown Girls!

2024 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-17vs V-LLW Loosely Strung-ThompsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Crossley / Beth Esters vs Shelly Crema / Ekaterina Teper2-6, 2-6
2024-11-10vs Royal GirlfriendsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Crossley / Beth Esters vs Renee Kieselbach / Sally Miller7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-03vs Sunset AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobyn Russak / Mary Crossley vs JANE HUANG / Dawn Stutzman1-6, 1-6
2024-10-26vs Sherwood StarletsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Crossley / Beth Esters vs Eileen Kakoyiannis / Hollis Lanson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-10-20vs Valle Lindo VolleygirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Crossley / Robyn Russak vs Judith Cade / Pamela Wax-Semus4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Na Shen
published
2.96
Robyn Russak
published
2.89
Lisa Weiss
published
2.88
Lisa Keatts
published
2.77
Ellen Swagerty
published
2.77
Mariah Tackett
published
2.77
Shirley Gordon
published
2.75
Mary Crossley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
HEather Hirschi
published
2.64
Robbie Knauer
published
2.63
Beth Esters
published 3
2.58
Marty Fraser
published
2.34
Ana Cholo
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Crossley + Lisa Weiss2942% games−1.5% vs expected
Mary Crossley + Lisa Keatts224 matchesnot enough data
Robbie Knauer + Marty Fraser134 matchesnot enough data
Robyn Russak + Lisa Weiss213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Na Shen
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Robyn Russak
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Lisa Weiss
24W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
2.89
Lisa Keatts
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
Ellen Swagerty
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Mariah Tackett
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Shirley Gordon
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Mary Crossley
50W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
HEather Hirschi
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.64
Robbie Knauer
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Beth Esters
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63
Marty Fraser
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58
2.5
Ana Cholo
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%87%13%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.