← Teams

SAC-Kemple

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.06 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Janet Ha
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.11
Mihye Ko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.07
Lara Greenberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.90
Dawan Pandya
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Jinmi Kemple
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Kusum Mehndiratta
published 3
2.73
Melissa Tom
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
2.68
Jeane Anastas
published 3
2.49
Anne Larson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-06-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJanet Ha / Sabine Verbiest vs ROSY ALANIS / Cyndi Johnson6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJinmi Kemple vs Chana Dolbey6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDawan Pandya / Melissa Tom vs Andria Neathamer / Alena Ofuasia6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJinmi Kemple / Sabine Verbiest vs Christine Egan / Jean Zuber Marshburn6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJanet Ha vs Sheryl Riley6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Larson / Lisa McConachie vs Judy Friedman / Tara Hieggelke6-2, 6-1
2024-06-01Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesLara Greenberg / Mihye Ko vs Christine Egan / Karen Kraus6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMelissa Tom vs Sheryl Riley7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJanet Ha / Lisa McConachie vs Dianna Kaady / Dar Dragoon6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJinmi Kemple / Na Yung Yu vs Michelle Robbins / Tara Hieggelke6-1, 6-3
2024-05-25Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJanet Ha / Kusum Mehndiratta vs Dana Alley / Elisa Wickstrom6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDawan Pandya vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLara Greenberg / Anne Larson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-19Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesSabine Verbiest / Lara Greenberg vs Yu Zhang / Nicole Norby6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnne Larson vs Catherine Huang6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDawan Pandya / Kusum Mehndiratta vs Janice Kuo / Jennifer Tobin6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiana Crawford / Mihye Ko vs Evelyne Cassell / Manisha Thakkar6-0, 6-2
2024-05-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJanet Ha / Jeane Anastas vs Lorri Asder / Robin Browne6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJinmi Kemple / Anne Larson vs Heidi Funke / Ute Kongsbak6-4, 6-3
2024-04-27Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesLara Greenberg / Janet Ha vs Jacquelyn Miller / Shelly Bigley6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMelissa Tom vs Emily Shields6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJinmi Kemple / Mihye Ko vs Molly Hisatomi / Adrienne Dedelow5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa McConachie / Dawan Pandya vs Valerie Hill / Jennifer Bifano7-6, 6-4
2024-04-14Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesJinmi Kemple / Sabine Verbiest vs Shannon Darrow / Autumn Bunch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelissa Tom vs Sumner Brooks6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDawan Pandya / April Mayers vs Lisa Mayer / Mary Rudinsky6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMihye Ko / Kusum Mehndiratta vs Cricket Forsey / Lisa McBee4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Janet Ha
105W–56L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3
Mihye Ko
98W–51L career
0%49%51%
3.11
3
Lara Greenberg
74W–43L career
0%64%36%
3.07
3
Dawan Pandya
58W–26L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Jinmi Kemple
75W–78L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Kusum Mehndiratta
20W–14L career
1%94%5%
2.84
3
Melissa Tom
39W–38L career
2%98%0%
2.73
3
Jeane Anastas
14W–31L career
4%96%0%
2.68
3
Anne Larson
43W–48L career
38%63%0%
2.49

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.