Teams

SD 8.0 Mtn View/ West

2023 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter - SD · SD - 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-26vs SD 8.0 UCRC/ ChinWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeth Timpe / Scot Gentry vs Keith Chin / Sarah Jensen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-18vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ AlvarezWon 10
W#2 DoublesTim Pillow / Beth Timpe vs Mark Bauer / Sherr Aquino6-3, 6-3
2023-02-11vs SD 8.0 SDTRC/ ChannickLost 02
L#1 DoublesBeth Timpe / Lorenzo Herrera vs Robin Maher / Rory Kish4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Khaokham / Scot Gentry vs Katerina Govoni / Jeffrey Bertolini4-6, 4-6
2023-01-28vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ KilleenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLorenzo Herrera / Christina Khaokham vs Sakiko Tadokoro / Takahiro Tadokoro6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Herrera / Tim Pillow vs Gina White / Alexis Akira Toda7-6, 6-2
2023-01-14vs SD 8.0 Peninsula TC/ SimmonsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTommy West / Cheryle Pillow vs Jeff Ray / Sarah Schultzel3-6, 1-6
2023-01-07vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ AlvarezWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Khaokham / Lorenzo Herrera vs Roxana Balboa / Anthony Reyes6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Cynthia Herrera
published 4.5
3.89
Hoang Kim Truong
published
3.84
Tim Pillow
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Beth Timpe
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Paola Romo
published
3.54
Christina Khaokham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
2.88
Cheryle Pillow
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Lorenzo Herrera
published
Madeleine West
published
Tommy West
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Pillow + Cheryle Pillow5445% games−8.9% vs expected
Tommy West + Madeleine West134 matchesnot enough data
Lorenzo Herrera + Cynthia Herrera303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cynthia Herrera
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
Hoang Kim Truong
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Tim Pillow
50W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Beth Timpe
99W–76L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Paola Romo
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Christina Khaokham
39W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
David Salazar Campos
0W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Cheryle Pillow
63W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Lorenzo Herrera
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Madeleine West
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tommy West
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.