Teams

Quail West - P. Davis

2025 Collier Adult 40 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-04vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetSplit 11
W#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Mary Huber-Olk vs Gabriela Chahwan / Alejandra Acuna6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Mills / Jill Teberg vs Susie Beaudet / Lucy Slaboch1-6, 0-6
2024-11-27vs The Strand - RoggeSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Susan Rogge6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Pam Davis vs Teri Gyemi / Katherine MacWilliams6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-11-20vs GreyHawk - LaFontaineSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Aster Leitner vs Margaret Caccia / Mara Williams6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Michelle Maggal2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-11-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Melissa Henderson6-2, 6-3
2024-11-06vs Mediterra - VaccariWon 20
W#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Mary Huber-Olk vs Rebecca Matarazzi / Stephanie Bauer7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJane Mills / Sylvia Lamantia vs Maureen Rennie / Sally Amato6-4, 6-3
2024-10-30vs The Strand - RoggeWon 10
W#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Susan Rogge6-4, 7-5
2024-10-23vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetWon 10
W#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Melody Miller7-6, 6-4
2024-10-16vs GreyHawk - LaFontaineWon 20
W#1 SinglesJane Mills vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJill Teberg / Mary Huber-Olk vs Maria Lafontaine / Laura Haney6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Melissa Bailey
published
3.62
Mary Huber-Olk
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Colleen Bresson
published 3.5
3.33
Sylvia Lamantia
published
3.32
Michelle Minor
published
3.28
3.23
Karen Romine
published
3.21
Suzi O'Connell
published
3.18
Jane Mills
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Aster Leitner
published 3.5
3.13
Leslie Martin
published
3.11
Pam Davis
published
3.11
Dawn Strang
published 3.5
3.10
Jennifer Koivu
published
3.08
Jill Teberg
published
Susan Tiano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Huber-Olk + Colleen Bresson11363% games+8.9% vs expected
Jill Teberg + Leslie Martin2446% games+3.8% vs expected
Colleen Bresson + Sylvia Lamantia213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Bailey
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Mary Huber-Olk
127W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Colleen Bresson
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Sylvia Lamantia
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Michelle Minor
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Lisa LaSpina Bonevento
13W–36L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Karen Romine
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Suzi O'Connell
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jane Mills
105W–100L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Aster Leitner
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Leslie Martin
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Pam Davis
2W–20L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Dawn Strang
29W–22L career · type A · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Koivu
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jill Teberg
5W–20L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Susan Tiano
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.