Teams

Game Set Lunch/Beerman - T. Ritter

Polk Casual League · Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_4

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Tiffany Love
published
3.12
Nathaly Arredondo
usually #5 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Dang Williamson
published 3.5
3.10
Hayley Hurd
published 3.5
2.92
Karen Hogg
published 3
2.80
Jihyeon Choe
published
2.80
Kristin Wyatt
published
2.73
Leisa Jordan
published
2.71
Sabina Elmasri
published
2.59
Tracey Ritter
published
2.55
Stacey McCastlain
published
2.54
Clara Copley
published 3
2.35
Rosa Jean
usually #3 Doubles 77%, also #4 Doubles 15% · published
Tori Hogg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Wyatt + Jihyeon Choe5451% games+5.9% vs expected
Rosa Jean + Tracey Ritter033 matchesnot enough data
Leisa Jordan + Karen Hogg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Love
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Nathaly Arredondo
78W–70L career · 11 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Dang Williamson
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Hayley Hurd
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Karen Hogg
84W–99L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Jihyeon Choe
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
Kristin Wyatt
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Leisa Jordan
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Sabina Elmasri
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Tracey Ritter
2W–14L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Stacey McCastlain
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Clara Copley
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
Rosa Jean
28W–56L career · 13 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.35
Tori Hogg
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.