Teams

Thornton 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM

2025 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Nixon / Gwenda Priest vs Dell Barbee / Tammie Hughes4-6, 2-3
L#2 DoublesDebbie Shiflet / Nancy McCoy vs Ann Evans / Kathryn Michaud1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanis Beshears / Anne Thornton vs Lynda Pegram / Lynn Tester3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesPamela Rosendale / Judy Eaton vs Tammy Pugh / Kathy Jones1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGwenda Priest / Mary Ann Nixon vs Christine Osteen / Debbie Thomas6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJanis Beshears / Jody Susong vs Betty Kramer / Robin Smith2-6, 6-7
2025-09-12vs Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesGwenda Priest / Mary Ann Nixon vs Julie Spence / Toni Lewis7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Davenport / Anne Thornton vs Catherine Tanner / Martha Fogleman1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Shiflet / Druid Michaels vs Mary Sexton / Cheryl Scott6-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesMary Fowler / Nancy McCoy vs Annie Chapman / Judy Thomas0-4
W#2 DoublesAnne Thornton / Jane Davenport vs Stacey Harris / Lisa Liringis7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJody Susong / Cindy McElreath vs Robin Crosier / Amy Dulin2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesVicky Bethel / Mary Ann Nixon vs Ann Evans / Kathryn Michaud0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Eaton / Druid Michaels vs Dell Barbee / Tammie Hughes2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCindy McElreath / Pamela Rosendale vs Lynda Pegram / Julia Barnes2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMary Fowler / Jody Susong vs Kimberly Salata / Kathy Jones0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Thornton / Jane Davenport vs Tammy Pugh / Debbie Burgess3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudy Eaton / Druid Michaels vs Robin Smith / Allison Waddell6-4, 6-1
2025-08-01vs Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Shiflet / Jane Davenport vs Karen Robinson / Toni Lewis4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Fowler / Nancy McCoy vs Teresa Yokeley / Katie Ballard4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGwenda Priest / Janis Beshears vs Mary Sexton / Cheryl Scott4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Pamela Rosendale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Druid Michaels
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Mary Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Gwenda Priest
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Jean Schmid
published
3.35
Mary Ann Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Debbie Shiflet
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Vicky Bethel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Judy Eaton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Anne Thornton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Jody Susong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Janis Beshears
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Cindy McElreath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Nancy McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicky Bethel + Jean Schmid3447% games−7.7% vs expected
Mary Fowler + Mary Ann Nixon1638% gamesnot enough data
Janis Beshears + Jody Susong2344% gamesnot enough data
Anne Thornton + Judy Eaton314 matchesnot enough data
Vicky Bethel + Mary Fowler033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Fowler + Jody Susong123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Nixon + Gwenda Priest123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Thornton + Janis Beshears033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Rosendale
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Druid Michaels
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.47
Mary Fowler
67W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Jean Schmid
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Mary Ann Nixon
35W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Debbie Shiflet
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Vicky Bethel
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.29
Judy Eaton
38W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Anne Thornton
16W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jody Susong
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Janis Beshears
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Cindy McElreath
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Nancy McCoy
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.