Teams

Mary Howard King

2026 Adult 55&Over-NE · Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-14vs Susanne LindseySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary King / Susie Miley vs Laura Orr / Beth Ray6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDorie Kisner / Gentry Parker vs Sherry Vance / Patti Carroll6-2, 6-0
2026-04-12vs Susanne LindseyWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusie Miley / Gentry Parker vs Sherry Vance / Debbie Wahl6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDorie Kisner / Missy Ford vs Lauren Reed / Beth Ray1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJenny Wright / Melanie Steen vs Laura Orr / Patti Carroll6-0, 6-2
2026-03-29vs Susanne LindseyWon 21
W#1 DoublesJenny Wright / Missy Ford vs Sherry Vance / Laura Orr6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTerri Amacker / Eydie Pullman vs Debbie Wahl / Patti Carroll6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMary King / Susie Miley vs Lauren Reed / Beth Ray3-6, 2-6
2026-03-26vs Susanne LindseyLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelanie Steen / Kathy Beasley vs Lauren Reed / Sherry Vance6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Wright / Hope Huey vs Doris Maness / Margaret Orr5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary King / Sandy Morris vs Patti Carroll / Beth Ray4-6, 3-6
2026-03-23vs Susanne LindseyWon 21
W#1 DoublesTerri Amacker / Kathy Beasley vs Sherry Vance / Debbie Wahl6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMissy Ford / Sandy Morris vs Lauren Reed / Beth Ray0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHope Huey / Melanie Steen vs Patti Carroll / Doris Maness7-5, 6-2
2026-03-08vs Susanne LindseyWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandy Morris / Eydie Pullman vs Lauren Reed / Doris Maness6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary King / Terri Amacker vs Sherry Vance / Debbie Wahl7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJenny Wright / Dorie Kisner vs Margaret Orr / Patti Carroll6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Melanie Steen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Gentry Parker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Sandy Morris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Eydie Pullman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Hope Huey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Kathy Beasley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.63
Dorie Kisner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Terri Amacker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.53
Missy Ford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Susie Miley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Amacker + Kathy Beasley2537% games−4.2% vs expected
Sandy Morris + Missy Ford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Steen
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Gentry Parker
17W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Sandy Morris
10W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Eydie Pullman
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Hope Huey
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Beasley
11W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Dorie Kisner
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
Terri Amacker
11W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Missy Ford
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.53
Susie Miley
29W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.