Teams

Emmendorfer 18s 7.5W Combo Thur PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 18 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-03vs Easley 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesCasey Emmendorfer / Hannah Higgins vs Virginia Easley / Lee Varner2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesErin Cockman / Michele Matthews vs Pam McAmis / Reeves Rhoten7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCameron Wannamaker / Tammy Dickenson vs Kathy Pace / Vangie Cruz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-27vs Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PMWon 20
W#1 DoublesHannah Higgins / Casey Emmendorfer vs Tracy Harlan / Jen Strasser6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCaroline Yates / Cameron Wannamaker vs Debbie Clancy / Catherine Tanner6-4, 6-0
2026-08-20vs Russo 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesCasey Emmendorfer / Jennifer Klein vs Stacey Russo / Melissa Doupe6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Yates / Michele Matthews vs Jen Berlin / Emmy Biaggi6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathy Brown / Tammy Dickenson vs Jeanie Reynolds / Alice Eaton2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCasey Emmendorfer / Erin Cockman vs Janel Green / Pam Fabros-Beuchat6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Brooks / Cameron Wannamaker vs Alexus Brown / Jasmine Johnson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichele Matthews / Katelyn Chapman vs Janess Reyna / Christina Mohorn6-0, 6-2
2026-08-13vs Goy 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesHannah Higgins / Katelyn Chapman vs Kelly Gekas / Courtney Jones2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelley Champion / Caroline Yates vs Alina Vannavong / Kimberly Halsey1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.5 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Goy 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PM2051442
2Isner/Strassell 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM2154989
3Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1021222
4Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1021433
5Dean 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1142548
6Easley 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1133863
7Emmendorfer 18s 7.5W Combo Thur PM1124847
8Mavronikolas/Tao 18s 7.5W Combo %hu4w PM1133960
9Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM12451177
10Russo 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM0224853
11Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM02151162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Hannah Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.57
Tammy Dickenson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Caroline Yates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Casey Emmendorfer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Betsy Hooper
published 3.5
3.38
Megan Noltemeyer
published
3.38
Michele Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Katelyn Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Kelly Glick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kathy Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Erin Cockman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Cameron Wannamaker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelley Champion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Caitlin Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Jennifer Klein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Glick + Jennifer Klein5164% games+11.7% vs expected
Casey Emmendorfer + Katelyn Chapman7260% games+7.7% vs expected
Kelly Glick + Megan Noltemeyer5063% games+0.0% vs expected
Kathy Brown + Tammy Dickenson2449% games−9.6% vs expected
Kelly Glick + Erin Cockman314 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Higgins + Casey Emmendorfer224 matchesnot enough data
Megan Noltemeyer + Erin Cockman404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Cockman + Michele Matthews404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hannah Higgins
10W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
Tammy Dickenson
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Caroline Yates
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Casey Emmendorfer
46W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Betsy Hooper
11W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Megan Noltemeyer
19W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Michele Matthews
29W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Katelyn Chapman
53W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Kelly Glick
27W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Kathy Brown
14W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Erin Cockman
33W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Cameron Wannamaker
26W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Kelley Champion
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Caitlin Brooks
15W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Jennifer Klein
36W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.