Teams

Arlington Aces VI

2023 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCalvin Cheng / Richard Gauthier vs John Bruner / Andrew Shore3-6, 3-6
2023-05-26vs Play it Forward 18Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlex Ross / Brandon Wales vs Phillip Harvin / Jarrett Ray6-1, 6-1
2023-05-20vs Team RJT M3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Mai / Brandon Wales vs Marc Gori / Arvind Jairam6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Gauthier / Miguel Mendoza vs Matthew Day / David Garriepy7-5, 3-3
2023-05-13vs Team WolvesWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrandon Wales / Wesley Stien vs Jay Colella / Frank Wang7-5, 6-3
2023-05-08vs Team CourtmastersLost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Gardiner / Mikhail Velasco vs Freddy Feliz / Sean Klinge4-6, 2-6
2023-05-06vs Team ChallengersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBrandon Wales / John Herne vs Tom Do / Matthew Troutman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMikhail Velasco / Miguel Mendoza vs Audie Blancaflor / Frank Pan5-7, 3-4
2023-04-13vs TEAM88Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRichard Gauthier / Miguel Mendoza vs Sakhoeun Tith / Anh Nguyen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMark Gardiner / Mikhail Velasco vs Allan Lee / Caleb Spradlin0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
JULIAN DAWSON
published
3.55
Jeffrey Mai
published
3.52
Brandon Wales
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.49
Jeremy Bloom
published
3.31
Calvin Cheng
published 3.5
3.27
Christopher Swider
published 3.5
Richard Gauthier
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.71
Miguel Mendoza
published
2.68
Mikhail Velasco
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mikhail Velasco + Richard Gauthier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

JULIAN DAWSON
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
Jeffrey Mai
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Brandon Wales
65W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jeremy Bloom
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Calvin Cheng
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Christopher Swider
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Richard Gauthier
47W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Miguel Mendoza
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Mikhail Velasco
42W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.