Teams

9 Canterbury Jones

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-09vs 7 RCC KochSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNikki Callaghan / Martinique Kandl vs Molly Smith / Lynda Weston6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesErin Lyons vs Amy Wozniak1-6, 2-6
2023-07-08vs 1 Woodlake PoindexterWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Jones / Martinique Kandl vs Susan Zielinski / Jennifer Harris6-2, 6-0
2023-07-01vs 10 Southampton BrownSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMartinique Kandl / Jennifer Funk vs Beth Morris / Laurie Huizenga2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErin Lyons / Deanne Ralston vs Alice Ulrichs / Kristin Kim4-6, 4-6
2023-06-24vs 8 ACAC Naylor/HoeferLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Jones / Martinique Kandl vs Julie Rison / Tracey Watson6-7, 2-6
2023-06-20vs 4 ACAC DavisWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartinique Kandl / Nancy Price vs Lisa Loudermilk / Erika King6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-11vs 5 Wyndham CarlyleLost 01
L#3 DoublesMari Litz / Erin Lyons vs Diana Dull / Sharon Moorefield2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Nancy Price
published
3.78
Lara Hansen
published
3.43
Martinique Kandl
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Rebecca Cassilly
published
3.22
Nikki Callaghan
published
3.20
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
3.17
Irene Quilez
published
3.03
Jennifer Funk
published
2.94
Cecilia Bergh
published 3
2.90
Amy Romero
published 3
2.88
Erin Lyons
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.85
Nicky Keller
published
2.84
Mari Litz
published
Lisa Aaron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Cassilly + Deanne Ralston3249% games−7.9% vs expected
Cecilia Bergh + Rebecca Cassilly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Price
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.81
Lara Hansen
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Martinique Kandl
166W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Rebecca Cassilly
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Irene Quilez
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Jennifer Funk
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Cecilia Bergh
15W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Amy Romero
20W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
Erin Lyons
87W–114L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Nicky Keller
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
2.85
Mari Litz
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
Lisa Aaron
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.