Teams

300 - Smith

2022 Alachua Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Borden / Malcolm Maden vs Christa Arnold / Jian Pu6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2022-05-31vs ALACHUA - DB - MadorskyLost 01
L#3 DoublesHelen Ingmarsson / Pierce Jones vs Genne' DeHenau McDonald / Michael Ryals3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-28Lost 02
L#2 DoublesChristine Borden / Malcolm Maden vs Anita Frankenberger / Jian Pu3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie McLaughlin / Richard Wright vs Christa Arnold / Ed Stark3-6, 3-6
2022-05-09Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Camin / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Cynthia Thibault / Hank Dudding3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesHelen Ingmarsson / Pierce Jones vs Ching Zhou / Zhong-Ren Peng2-6, 2-6
2022-04-30vs ALACHUA - JTC - GilsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Flowers / Laurie McLaughlin vs Mark Diblin / Susie Finfrock5-7, 5-7
2022-04-16vs ALACHUA - DB - MadorskyLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Genne' DeHenau McDonald / Michael Ryals2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Christine Borden
published 3.5
3.14
Laurie McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Cindy McManus
published 3.5
3.11
Lawrence Hooghuis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Lindy Archambeau
published
3.01
John Flowers
published
2.94
Helen Ingmarsson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Isabel Silver
published
Malcolm Maden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Wright
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Borden
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Laurie McLaughlin
78W–154L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Cindy McManus
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Lawrence Hooghuis
53W–135L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lindy Archambeau
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
John Flowers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Helen Ingmarsson
42W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Christopher Silver
1W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Isabel Silver
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Malcolm Maden
34W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Wright
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.