Teams

Cheval Aces and Sevens - N. Martinez

2022 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-09vs HG Emerald Aces - E. CollinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Hayes / Kristin McCormick vs Robert Soriano / Tibbie Farnsworth6-4, 6-2
2022-03-06vs Buckhorn Double Shots - J. TorresWon 20
W#1 DoublesAleksandar Seovic / Marija Seovic vs Margareta Henderson / Donald Williams6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLouis Hanna / Lorrie White vs Teresa Manganello / Bing Li3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-02vs Hills - Tampa Palms 7.0/HelmeWon 10
W#3 DoublesAleksandar Seovic / Marija Seovic vs Ian Zhang / Marla Adams6-1, 6-2
2022-02-20vs Grand Hampton - M. HartlineWon 20
W#1 DoublesAleksandar Seovic / Marija Seovic vs Alys Klouse / Shrini Varude6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatthew Hayes / Lorrie White vs Melinda Hartline / PRAFUL NAIR6-3, 6-4
2022-01-31vs SVB - B. DunneWon 10
W#1 DoublesAleksandar Seovic / Marija Seovic vs Jarrod Derksen / Sylvie Derksen6-0, 6-3
2022-01-30vs Arbor Greene - B. HartLost 01
L#1 DoublesAleksandar Seovic / Marija Seovic vs Darin Garner / Jody McNamee3-6, 3-6
2022-01-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Constantine / Lorrie White vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.66
3.64
Matthew Hayes
published
3.48
Kristin McCormick
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.32
Fatima Zinober
published 3.5
3.31
Marija Seovic
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Luke Gatza
published
3.20
Ken Patrick
published
3.15
Lorrie White
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Aleksandar Seovic
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorrie White + Ken Patrick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Charles Constantine
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Matthew Hayes
17W–23L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Kristin McCormick
105W–82L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Fatima Zinober
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Marija Seovic
99W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Luke Gatza
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Ken Patrick
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lorrie White
184W–124L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Aleksandar Seovic
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.