Teams

Oxford Tennis Club

NORTHERN 65 & Over Summer · 7.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / DELAWARE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-08-08vs Bellevue 65ersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDan Kowalski / Jim Harrison vs Robert Dewey / James Horgan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlex Bourdon / Ross Wilcox vs Mike Censurato / Dick Goldschmidt4-6, 0-6
2023-07-18vs Bellevue 65ersWon 21
W#1 DoublesDan Kowalski / Peter Panzer vs Robert Dewey / Roman Erenshteyn6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Annos / Carlo Ciccarone vs Mike Censurato / James Horgan6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRichard Squadron / Izak Bahar vs Joseph Brennan / Manuel Malangyaon7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carlo Ciccarone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Dan Kowalski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alex Bourdon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Bruce Konyak
published
Izak Bahar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lewis Martin
published
Peter Panzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Squadron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ross Wilcox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Daly
published
Wayne Erne
published
William Annos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carlo Ciccarone + Jim Harrison15161% gamesnot enough data
Jim Harrison + Dan Kowalski5650% gamesnot enough data
Peter Panzer + Dan Kowalski8358% gamesnot enough data
Wayne Erne + Dan Kowalski6258% gamesnot enough data
Richard Squadron + Peter Panzer3456% gamesnot enough data
Jim Harrison + Peter Panzer4257% gamesnot enough data
Carlo Ciccarone + Wayne Erne224 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Erne + Izak Bahar044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carlo Ciccarone
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dan Kowalski
34W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.15
Alex Bourdon
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Bruce Konyak
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Izak Bahar
103W–98L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jim Harrison
28W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lewis Martin
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Panzer
29W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Richard Squadron
14W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Ross Wilcox
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Daly
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wayne Erne
88W–112L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Annos
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.