Teams

Rosenberg

2026 18&Over Women Manhattan · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.36 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-29vs Gould/WellesLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Rosenberg / Lisa Drinnan vs Annette Welles / Theresa Fisher2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Nask / Karen Moriarty vs Gail Shube / Rebecca Wehrle6-7, 6-6
L#3 DoublesMimi Palecek / Lucy Burnhams vs Katherine Whyte / Patricia Gould6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-24vs Volley LlamasLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Moriarty / Susan Nask vs Leigh Flayton / Kendall Gastelu5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Rosenberg / Lucy Burnhams vs Christina Mott / Tracey Amdur1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Schmelter / Lauren Zalta vs Sally McKenzie / Tracey Thatcher2-6, 1-6
2026-06-07vs IshizawaLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Moriarty / Susan Nask vs Fumie Ishizawa / Argine Choremi2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Petsch / Mimi Palecek vs Stephanie Miao / Alina Binder2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesPaige Voeffray vs Kavitha Shastry5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Zalta / Sadie Rose Darwish vs Choi Fei Ko / Stephanie Kiss7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-06-03vs Sasaki/Lake-JedzinakLost 04
L#1 DoublesAllison Rosenberg / Esther W Li vs Dayna Coulter / Bianca Isabela Catoto3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAgathe Sadeghi vs Lea Glueck0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Moriarty / Susan Nask vs Martha Arreguin / Jessica Sasaki3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesEmma Jablonski vs Kitty Anderson-Galvez0-6, 1-6
2026-05-27vs Ziluca/BonillaLost 05
L#1 DoublesKaren Moriarty / Susan Nask vs Lea Lasman / Amy Kline7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEsther W Li vs Courtenay O'Connor1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Rosenberg / Mimi Palecek vs Christie Bonilla / Abby Ziluca1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Zalta vs Youngna Park3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Petsch / Sadie Rose Darwish vs Robin Sacks / Jane Rizzo3-6, 0-6
2026-05-17vs Metro: LekserLost 05
L#1 DoublesAmanda Ansell / Lisa Drinnan vs Tenzin Donmae / Ling Zhang2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMimi Palecek vs Victoria Jian4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Voeffray / Jessie Sarkis vs Summer Than / Grace Liu3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAgathe Sadeghi vs Julien Li1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Schmelter / Sadie Rose Darwish vs Rosie Shen / Elise LaCarrubba1-6, 2-6
2026-05-04vs MaselbasLost 13
L#1 DoublesCatherine Schmelter / Jessie Sarkis vs Lisa Bernstein / Jacquelyn Lipson1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMimi Palecek vs Sarah Reiser5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Rosenberg / Esther W Li vs Marcelle de Soares / Jessica Stewart6-3, 6-5
L#2 SinglesPaige Voeffray vs Sarah Tintle4-6, 5-7
2026-04-26vs Volley LlamasSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLucy Burnhams / Jessie Sarkis vs Lauren Kende / Giselle Wyckoff4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Moriarty / Emma Jablonski vs Tracey Thatcher / Nicole Sharett0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMimi Palecek vs Soo-mi Lee6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAllison Rosenberg / Agathe Sadeghi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Samantha Bidermann
published
Emma Jablonski
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Lucy Burnhams
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Mimi Palecek
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Esther W Li
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Lauren Zalta
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.08
Jessie Sarkis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Karen Moriarty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Paige Voeffray
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Amanda Ansell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Lisa Drinnan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Sadie Rose Darwish
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Catherine Schmelter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Susan Nask
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.68
Allison Rosenberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Melanie Petsch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Agathe Sadeghi
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Moriarty + Susan Nask2547% games+6.9% vs expected
Lucy Burnhams + Paige Voeffray123 matchesnot enough data
Sadie Rose Darwish + Lauren Zalta033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Bidermann
15W–11L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Emma Jablonski
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lucy Burnhams
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Mimi Palecek
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Esther W Li
0W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.14
Lauren Zalta
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Jessie Sarkis
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Karen Moriarty
181W–179L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Paige Voeffray
23W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Amanda Ansell
67W–90L career · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Lisa Drinnan
48W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Sadie Rose Darwish
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3.5
Catherine Schmelter
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Susan Nask
92W–91L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Allison Rosenberg
26W–112L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Melanie Petsch
21W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Agathe Sadeghi
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.