Teams

Players Club / Cappello

2025 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 6.0 Adult 65 & over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-11vs Naples YMCA / TitmusWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Vermillion / Judith Cappello vs Christine Huck / Becky Titmus7-6, 6-3
2025-03-04vs Fiddlers Creek / SheldonWon 10
W#3 DoublesJudith Cappello / Linda Vermillion vs Annette Tuebner / Leslie Sheldon6-0, 6-1
2025-02-25vs Florida/Mushock/65&Over6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudith Cappello / Linda Vermillion vs Joyce Bunting / Helen Wardell1-6, 1-6
2025-02-18vs Village Walk Bonita / GreekLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Sims / Coral-Jeanne O'Connor vs Vicki MacE / Betty Zink4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJanet Olliges / Melanie Rose vs Cynthia Hile / Kathleen Jozwiak1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Shevlin / Linda Vermillion vs Diane Cosner / Mary McIntire6-7, 4-6
2025-02-04vs Naples YMCA / TitmusLost 01
L#3 DoublesJudith Cappello / Karen Shmihluk vs Josephine Angevin / Christine Huck3-6
2025-01-14vs Village Walk Bonita / GreekWon 10
W#3 DoublesJudith Cappello / Karen Shmihluk vs Janice Lose / Mary McIntire6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 65 & over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Diane Sullivan
published 3
2.76
Judith Cappello
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Coral-Jeanne O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Janet Olliges
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Vermillion
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marianne Becker
published
Melanie Rose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Sims
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Cappello + Marianne Becker5257% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Rose + Janet Olliges123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Sullivan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Judith Cappello
55W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Coral-Jeanne O'Connor
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Janet Olliges
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Linda Vermillion
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marianne Becker
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Rose
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Sims
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.