Teams

NOGTA/Carol Tigar

2024 · 2025 NOGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-17vs AndersenWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Tigar / Sharel Hooper vs Lynne Barkeloo / Charmaine Kincaid2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarialice Hatch / Elizabeth Smith vs Betty Andersen / Renee McClanahan7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-11-10vs AndersenLost 02
L#2 DoublesLorraine Marks / Kimberly Conner vs Lucynda Cynda Holmes / Heather Tuttle1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLAURA VAUGHN / Elizabeth Smith vs Deborah Nation / Renee McClanahan4-6, 5-7
2024-11-03vs AndersenWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Tigar / Sharel Hooper vs Darlene Morgan / Rhonda Garrett6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Stamper / Marialice Hatch vs Deborah Nation / Heather Tuttle6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLAURA VAUGHN / Elizabeth Smith vs Betty Andersen / Charmaine Kincaid6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-27vs AndersenWon 21
L#1 DoublesSharel Hooper / Lorraine Marks vs Lynne Barkeloo / Renee McClanahan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Tigar / Jessica Stamper vs Amy Weathers / Michelle Rauch6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarialice Hatch / Elizabeth Smith vs Charmaine Kincaid / Lucynda Cynda Holmes6-2, 6-3
2024-10-20vs AndersenWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Cook / Sharel Hooper vs Betty Andersen / Rhonda Garrett6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJessica Stamper / Marialice Hatch vs Renee McClanahan / Heather Tuttle6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Tigar / Kimberly Conner vs Lynne Barkeloo / Darlene Morgan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 NOGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Sharel Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Carol Tigar
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Jessica Stamper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Lorraine Marks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Marialice Hatch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Kimberly Conner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
LAURA VAUGHN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharel Hooper + Carol Tigar5262% games−5.8% vs expected
Jessica Stamper + Marialice Hatch404 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Stamper + Carol Tigar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharel Hooper
21W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Carol Tigar
37W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
Jessica Stamper
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lorraine Marks
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Marialice Hatch
25W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Kimberly Conner
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
LAURA VAUGHN
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.