Teams

OK/Brookover/55&over9.0W

2022 TUL ADULT 55 & Over League · 9.0 WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-18vs Tasker/PH 9.0 55 & overSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSharon Cash / Sherry Fine vs Leanne Barlow / Gail Gillock6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKimberly Jones / Janet Chambers vs Mary Jo Tasker / Diane Wood3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-11vs Tasker/PH 9.0 55 & overWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaurie Alfrey / Kimberly Jones vs Betsy Bryce / Sara Delgado6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Bursack / Mary Fox vs Colleen Schulz / Michelle Oatman6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSherry Fine / Sharon Anthamatten vs Gail Gillock / Mary Jo Tasker6-4, 6-4
2022-02-05vs Tasker/PH 9.0 55 & overWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmanda Scroggs / Mary Bursack vs Leanne Barlow / Tammy Mathias6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Alfrey / Kimberly Jones vs Sara Delgado / Diane Wood6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Little / Sharon Cash vs Michelle Oatman / Michelle Hassell6-4, 6-2
2022-01-24vs Tasker/PH 9.0 55 & overWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Allman / Mary Fox vs Gail Gillock / Mary Jo Tasker6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Little / Carol Griffith vs Colleen Schulz / Michelle Hassell6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJana Brookover / Sherry Fine vs Betsy Bryce / Michelle Oatman6-4, 6-4
2022-01-17vs Tasker/PH 9.0 55 & overWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Little / Mary Bursack vs Betsy Bryce / Michelle Hassell6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmanda Scroggs / Mary Fox vs Colleen Schulz / Tammy Mathias6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Chambers / Sharon Anthamatten vs Diane Wood / Leanne Barlow6-2, 6-2
2022-01-06vs Tasker/PH 9.0 55 & overWon 21
L#1 DoublesSharon Cash / Carol Griffith vs Colleen Schulz / Michelle Oatman6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Alfrey / Kimberly Jones vs Gail Gillock / Diane Wood6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Allman / Jana Brookover vs Betsy Bryce / Michelle Hassell6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Laurie Alfrey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Sharon Anthamatten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Amanda Scroggs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Janet Chambers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Laura Allman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Sharon Cash
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.93
Sherry Fine
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.89
Carol Griffith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Jana Brookover
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Bursack
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Fox
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Melissa Little
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Chambers + Laura Allman6356% games+8.3% vs expected
Sharon Anthamatten + Laurie Alfrey6262% games+6.5% vs expected
Sharon Anthamatten + Jana Brookover4450% games+6.3% vs expected
Melissa Little + Janet Chambers3257% games+5.4% vs expected
Sherry Fine + Laura Allman8457% games+3.6% vs expected
Sharon Anthamatten + Laura Allman121055% games+1.8% vs expected
Mary Fox + Carol Griffith4257% games+1.8% vs expected
Sharon Anthamatten + Sherry Fine5649% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Alfrey
40W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
4.44
Sharon Anthamatten
75W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Amanda Scroggs
101W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Janet Chambers
78W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
Laura Allman
57W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
Sharon Cash
52W–57L career · 7 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
Sherry Fine
81W–85L career · 8 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.93
4.5
Carol Griffith
48W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.89
Jana Brookover
49W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Bursack
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Fox
35W–29L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Little
20W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.