Teams

OVP Fulton 6.5

2025 COTA USTA Southern Combo 18 & Over Business - Summer · 6.5 Bus Combo

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-17vs ATC/HalversonCOMBOWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Harrison / Rebecca Rinckey vs Lynn Halverson / Courtney McCracken6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Fulton / Katharine Odom vs Dee Donaldson / Sherri Butler7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Ehrenreich / Elizabeth Fuller vs Katherine May / Patty Crumbley6-1, 6-1
2025-08-10vs OVP/Snyder 6,5 comboLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Ryan / Judy Scott vs Maridell Banks / Cathleen Stripling3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCherie McAdams / Emily Bahnsen vs Meredith Payne / Cali Brutz2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDenise Fulton / Katharine Odom vs Jessica Bond / Alison Godley6-3, 6-2
2025-08-07vs ATC/Carabello 18 6.5 comboWon 21
L#1 DoublesAngela Ryan / Emily Claire Kelly vs Ashlie Johnson / Kelly Barnhill1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Fulton / Rebecca Rinckey vs Andra Nelson / Whitney Burton6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJudy Scott / Shelley Geib vs Gail Ford / Allison Donatelli6-0, 6-1
2025-07-27vs BP/Langdon SundayWon 30
W#1 DoublesDenise Fulton / Angela Ryan vs Liliana McMain / Jennifer Howes3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShelley Geib / Emily Harrison vs Angela Stanley / Stephanie Crunkleton6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesConstance Ondo / Rebecca Rinckey vs Kim Alix Langdon / Monica Skrzypinski6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-20vs GA 6.5W 18 & Over (Crowe)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Fuller / Constance Ondo vs Lindsay Peters / Ellyn Logan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Ehrenreich / Shelley Geib vs Courtney Clark / Victoria Vadeboncoeur1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCherie McAdams / Emily Bahnsen vs Cailey Wilcox / Meghan Imrie2-6, 2-6
2025-07-06vs ATC Gattiker Sunday 6.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Harrison / Elizabeth Fuller vs Sydney Felker / Angela Dean0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Fulton / Angela Ryan vs Claire Pennell / Allison Coulter6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCherie McAdams / Emily Bahnsen vs Elizabeth Davis / Sheila Devaney6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-22vs ATC/Hale–Goodie 6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Harrison / Shelley Geib vs Kimberly Bell / Amanda Wilson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Ehrenreich / Katharine Odom vs Susan McKinney / Heather Watson0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Bahnsen / Emily Claire Kelly vs Jo-Ann Thorne / Melanie Hewell6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Bus Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Emily Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Rebecca Rinckey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Denise Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Emily Claire Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Constance Ondo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Judy Scott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Heidi Ehrenreich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Angela Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Katharine Odom
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Cherie McAdams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Elizabeth Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.71
Shelley Geib
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Emily Bahnsen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Fulton + Angela Ryan6352% games+13.1% vs expected
Shelley Geib + Emily Harrison303 matchesnot enough data
Cherie McAdams + Emily Bahnsen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Harrison
22W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Rebecca Rinckey
51W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
3.5
Denise Fulton
41W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Emily Claire Kelly
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Constance Ondo
9W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Judy Scott
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
Heidi Ehrenreich
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Angela Ryan
37W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Katharine Odom
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Cherie McAdams
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Fuller
14W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Shelley Geib
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Emily Bahnsen
21W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.