Teams

GEPTA-6.0-Adult/55+M(Zanolli)(TW)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarcos Calderon / Javier Navarro vs David Turbay / Peter Thompson6-3, 6-3
2024-07-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Tepsick / Javier Navarro vs Alberto Batalla / Jorge Kareh2-6, 2-6
2024-06-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Ninkovich / Javier Navarro vs Arvind Singhal / Juan Taveras6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJavier Navarro / William Tepsick vs Ricardo Gonzalez / James McCleland4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2024 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southwest/Andalis/55&over/6.0M7116819209
2GEPTA-6.0-Adult/55+M(Ferris)(EPTC#1)35121229237
3GEPTA-6.0-Adult/55+M(Zanolli)(TW)2681636254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Daniel Gallatin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 3
2.76
Christopher Ninkovich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Bosko Lemez
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Ed Savedra
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
James Zanolli
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #4 Doubles 26% · published
Javier Navarro
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Marcos Calderon
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roland Correa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Tepsick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Tepsick + Ed Savedra0633% gamesnot enough data
William Tepsick + James Zanolli0520% gamesnot enough data
Ed Savedra + Daniel Gallatin3250% gamesnot enough data
William Tepsick + Daniel Gallatin134 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Gallatin + James Zanolli044 matchesnot enough data
Roland Correa + James Zanolli033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daniel Gallatin
52W–80L career · 40 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Christopher Ninkovich
25W–25L career · 18 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Bosko Lemez
7W–10L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ed Savedra
53W–71L career · 38 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Zanolli
6W–38L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
Javier Navarro
28W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcos Calderon
12W–20L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
Roland Correa
2W–7L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Tepsick
22W–82L career · 32 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.