Teams

Leon/Huffman/40&Over3.0W

2025 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W Adult 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-14vs FlowersWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Dove / Andrea Baker vs Julie Moss / Kristen Knapp6-1, 6-3
2025-03-25vs BoulosWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary MacKo / Sally Davis vs Ellen Cannon / Debara Jump6-2, 6-2
2025-03-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesAdriene Wright / Mary MacKo vs Celeste Ivory / Lena Juarez6-2, 6-3
2025-03-12vs FlowersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Baker / Diane Dove vs Karen Devorace / Nicole Watson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary MacKo / Adriene Wright vs Robyn Flowers / MICHELLE BEMBRY6-4, 6-4
2025-03-04vs BoulosLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Baker / Diane Dove vs Priscilla Bailey-Brown / Barkley Wilhite6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-19vs SirianniWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Baker / Diane Dove vs Virginia Dailey / Debbie Hall6-4, 7-6
2025-02-10vs SirianniWon 10
W#2 DoublesClaire Chiara / Mary MacKo vs Celeste Ivory / Virginia Dailey6-1, 6-4
2025-02-03vs FlowersLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Baker / Diane Dove vs Amy Cade / Nicole Watson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJan Murdock / Mary MacKo vs Julie Moss / Kristen Knapp5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLaura Gibson / Claire Chiara vs Robyn Flowers / Andrea Gale6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cassie Brooks
published 3.5
3.15
Susan Ault
published
2.91
Diane Dove
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.67
Adriene Wright
published 3
2.64
Claire Chiara
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.46
Laura Gibson
published
2.38
Andrea Baker
published 3
Jan Murdock
published
Linda Huffman
published
Mary MacKo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sally Davis
published
Sharon Banasiewicz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary MacKo + Claire Chiara4254% gamesnot enough data
Diane Dove + Andrea Baker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cassie Brooks
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Ault
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Diane Dove
51W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Adriene Wright
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Claire Chiara
46W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Laura Gibson
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.46
3
Andrea Baker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Jan Murdock
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Huffman
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary MacKo
81W–69L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Davis
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Banasiewicz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.